|
- The Ark of the
Covenant
Special Article -
written
by Mary Nell (Mrs.
Ron) Wyatt
AT THIS TIME, WYATT
ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESEARCH
CAN PROVIDE NO
CONCLUSIVE EVIDENCE
REGARDING THE DISCOVERY
OF THE ARK OF THE
COVENANT.

There
are many claims being
made today as to the
location of the Ark of
the Covenant and the
purpose of this site
is to give you an
opportunity to hear
Ron Wyatt's story as
he has told it and his
wife has written it.
For now, we cannot
provide conclusive
evidence of his claims
and we only ask you to
consider carefully
what you are about to
read, and withhold
your final judgment
until you can see
conclusive evidence.
What
you are about to read
is startling and may
present new concepts
that seem almost
incredible. Wonderful
and solemn new insight
has been shed on a
subject that is
central throughout the
entire Bible - the
salvation of man
through the death and
mediation of the
Messiah. As you read
this account, remember
the Biblical
admonition:
To
the law and to the
testimony: if they
speak not according to
this word, it is
because there is no
light in them.
.......Isaiah 8:19
The
Discovery of the Ark
of the Covenant
by Ron Wyatt - The
Search Begins
In
1978, Ron and his
sons, Danny and Ronny,
made two trips to
Israel in order to
drive down to
the western shore of
the Gulf of Aqaba in
Egypt to search for
chariot parts in the
Red Sea. This was
during the time that
Israel was occupying
the Sinai Peninsula
and therefore, the
place Ron believed to
be the crossing site
could only be reached
by traveling from
Israel instead of
going through Cairo.
During
his 2nd dive trip, he
learned a very painful
lesson. He swam for
hours, searching the
sea floor at a depth
of about 30 feet -
believing that the
water would filter out
the sun's harmful
rays. However, this
wasn't the case and as
a result, his legs and
feet became painfully
swollen to such an
extent that he
couldn't get his fins
on.
Unable
to dive anymore, and
with no motel in the
area, he and the boys
had no choice but to
return to Jerusalem to
wait until their
flight from Tel Aviv
left for the US.
One
day in Jerusalem,
after the swelling in
Ron's legs and feet
went down a bit, he
decided to go
sightseeing in the
immediate area around
his hotel near the
Damascus Gate. Walking
along an ancient stone
quarry, known to some
as "the Calvary
Escarpment," he
began conversing with
a local authority
about Roman
antiquities. At one
point, they stopped
walking, and Ron's
left hand pointed to a
site being used as a
trash dump and he
stated, "That's
Jeremiah's Grotto and
the Ark of the
Covenant is in
there." Even
though these words had
come from his own
mouth and his own hand
had pointed, he had
not consciously done
or said these things.
In fact, it was the
first time he had ever
thought about
excavating for the
Ark.
The
man with him, quite
out of character, also
reacted strangely. He
said, "That's
wonderful! We want you
to excavate, and we'll
furnish your permits,
put you up in a place
to stay and even
furnish your
meals!"
But
Ron didn't know what
to think - he knew it
was a
"supernatural"
experience, but was it
of God, or was it of
"someone
else"? By this
time, Ron had made
major discoveries in
Turkey, and had found
numerous chariot parts
in the Red Sea. But
not once had he ever
had an experience such
as this. It was like a
thunderbolt out of the
blue on a perfectly
sunny day. He had to
decline the man's
offer, at least until
he could figure out if
there was any reason
to believe the Ark
could be in that
location. So, he and
the boys came on home
as planned. But once
at home, Ron began
some serious research
and study.
What
is the "Ark of
the Covenant"?
"Types
and Antitypes"
All
of the objects of the
earthly tabernacle
were "patterns
of things in the
heavens" (see
Hebrews 9:23).
The
Ark represented God's
Throne - it was where
He manifested His
Presence among His
people. This earthly
Throne was a
"copy", so
to speak, of the Great
Throne in Heaven.
Beneath
His Throne, God's
immutable Law, the 10
Commandments, lie
inside the earthly
Ark, just as the great
originals are beneath
His Throne in Heaven.
In
the side of the Ark
was placed a copy of
the Mosaic law. At one
time, Aaron's rod and
the pot of manna were
in it, but when the
Ark was placed in
Solomon's temple, we
learned that those
were no longer there.
(1Kings 8:9)
Above
the Mercy Seat of the
earthly Ark was where
God communed with
Moses; it was where He
met with the high
priest once a year on
the Day of Atonement,
when the sins of the
people that had been
confessed throughout
the year were
figuratively cleansed
from the sanctuary.
His Presence was
always there, until He
left the temple
forever, just before
they went into
Babylonian captivity.
Ezekiel saw, in
vision, the Glory of
the Lord leave the
temple. (Eze. 8:6 and
11:22,23)
Later,
Ezekiel was given, in
prophetic vision, the
new instructions for
the re-instituting of
the sacrificial system
which contained no
mention of the Ark. (Eze.
42-44)
And
of course, everyone is
familiar with the fact
that the Ark was
sacred - so sacred
that if anyone touched
it or looked upon it,
they were struck dead
immediately. We've had
a number of people
approach us with the
theory that it is
electrically charged,
etc. and they wonder
if it is still
dangerous to touch.
Let's discuss that
point for a moment.
These folks have a
legitimate question.
"Instant
Death"
Why
was it instant death
for anyone to touch it
or gaze upon it? The
Bible doesn't
specifically spell out
the answer - but the
answer, I believe, is
there.
The
Ark is where God
actually manifested
His Presence:
LEV
16:2 And the LORD said
unto Moses, Speak unto
Aaron thy brother,
that he come not at
all times into the
holy place within the
vail before the mercy
seat, which is upon
the ark; that he
die not: for I will
appear in the cloud
upon the mercy seat.
EXO
25:22 And there I
will meet with thee,
and I will commune
with thee from above
the mercy seat, from
between the two
cherubims which are
upon the ark of the
testimony, of all
things which I will
give thee in
commandment unto the
children of Israel.
The
physical Presence of
God was upon the Mercy
Seat and as we know
that God cannot look
upon sin, it meant
instant destruction to
any human,
except the high
priest, who came in
contact with the
earthly "Throne
of the Lord":
HAB
1:13
Thou art of purer
eyes than to behold
evil, and canst not
look on iniquity:
God
would not permit men
to defile His earthly
Throne. This was the
one object on earth
which they were
powerless to defile.
This entire planet is
temporarily
"ruled" by
its prince, Satan -
and in order for God
to be able to meet
with His chosen
people, He provided
Himself a Throne that
was not defiled by
Satan or his followers
(angels or men.).
What
is the Ark's
significance today? We
believe the key to
this subject lies in
the "types"
and
"antitypes"
of the sacrificial
system.
Sins
of the People
Transferred to the
Sanctuary,
then
the DAY OF ATONEMENT
The
sacrificial system was
designed to teach the
people how to approach
God through the merits
of the future
Sinbearer, Who would
die once and for all
for their sins. It
represented the work
of Christ as both
Sacrifice and High
Priest.
"Important
truths concerning the
atonement were taught
the people by this
yearly service. In the
sins offerings
presented during the
year, a substitute has
been accepted in the
sinner's stead; but
the blood of the
victim had not made
full atonement for the
sin. It had only
provided a means by
which the sin was
transferred to the
sanctuary. By the
offering of blood, the
sinner acknowledged
the authority of the
Law, confessed the
guilt of his
transgression, and
expressed his faith in
Him who was to take
away the sin of the
world; but he was not
entirely released from
the condemnation of
the Law. "
On
the Day of
Atonement , the
high priest, having
taken an offering for
the congregation, went
into the most holy
place with the blood
and sprinkled it upon
the mercy seat, above
the Tables of the Law.
Thus, the claims of
the law, which
demanded the life of
the sinner, were
satisfied. Then, in
his character of
mediator, the priest
took the sins upon
himself, and, leaving
the sanctuary, he bore
with him the burden of
Israel's guilt.
At
the door of the
tabernacle he laid his
hands upon the head of
the scapegoat and
confessed over him
"all the
iniquities of the
children of Israel,
and all their
transgressions in all
their sins, putting
them upon the head of
the goat." And as
the goat bearing these
sins was sent away,
they were, with him,
regarded as forever
separated from the
people, Such was the
service performed
"unto the example
and shadow of heavenly
things." (Hebrews
8:5)
Concerning
the 2nd apartment, or
Most Holy Place, where
the Ark was:
HEB
9:7
But into the second
went the high priest
alone once every year,
not without blood,
which he offered for
himself, and for the
errors of the people:
8 The Holy Ghost
this signifying, that
the way into the
holiest of all was not
yet made manifest,
while as the first
tabernacle was yet
standing: 9 Which
was a figure for the
time then present,
in which were offered
both gifts and
sacrifices, that could
not make him that did
the service perfect,
as pertaining to the
conscience;
The
Ark wasn't just a
sacred box - it was
far more. It was the
central means
(symbolically) of the
final cleansing of the
sanctuary of the sins
of the people, just as
the Throne room of God
in Heaven is central
to Christ's final acts
as our great High
Priest.
History
of the "Ark"
What
Happened to the Ark?
In
searching the Bible, Ron
found the last mention
in the Bible of the
Ark's location:
2CH
35:1 Moreover Josiah
kept a Passover unto the
LORD in Jerusalem: and
they killed the Passover
on the fourteenth day of
the first month.... 3
And said unto the
Levites that taught all
Israel, which were holy
unto the LORD, PUT THE
HOLY ARK IN THE HOUSE
WHICH SOLOMON THE SON OF
DAVID KING OF ISRAEL DID
BUILD; it shall not be a
burden upon your
shoulders: serve now the
LORD your God, and his
people Israel,... 19 In
the EIGHTEENTH YEAR OF
THE REIGN OF JOSIAH was
this Passover kept.
This
was about the year 621
BC, just 35 years before
the destruction of
Jerusalem and the temple
by Nebuchadnezzar, when
Judah went into the
second phase of their
Babylonian captivity.
This information told
Ron that the Ark
disappeared from the
Divine record sometime
between 621 BC and 586
BC. Since the temple was
completely destroyed,
there is no doubt that
it was NOT there after
that time.
As
Ron continued to study,
he noticed something he
found strange - in 2
Kings 24:13, 2Kings
25:13-18, and Jeremiah
52:17-23, a very
detailed account was
given of the items taken
to Babylon from the
"king's house"
and the "house of
the Lord" - it even
mentioned small items
like "spoons",
etc. But the Ark isn't
mentioned.
Neither
is it mentioned in the
lists of things brought
back from Babylon in
Ezra 1:7-1:11. Since we
are told in Jeremiah
28:3 that everything
taken to Babylon from
the "house of the
Lord" would be
returned, and since the
Ark wasn't among the
returned items, this
proves that it was
never taken to Babylon .
Shishak
(Egyptian pharaoh) and
Sennacherib (king of
Assyria) are also
mentioned as having
taken items from the
"house of the
Lord" - but neither
did any of those items
include the Ark.
So
what happened to it? In
2 Kings 25:1, telling
about the siege of
Jerusalem by Babylon, we
are told that the
Babylonian army
"pitched against
it" and built
"forts against it
round about" -
which means they built a
"siege wall".
This verse further tells
that the siege lasted
over a year before the
city was taken. And it
was with this verse that
Ron found the evidence
which indicated to him
that the Ark could be in
the location he had
pointed to. Of course,
it wasn't positive proof
- to Ron it only meant
that it was a
possibility. What did
this "siege
wall" have to do
with the Ark? The
Siege Wall
Siege
walls were built by
attacking armies outside
of the walls of the city
under attack, at a
distance outside of the
range of the weapons
used by that city - what
were these weapons
during this time?
2CH
26:14 And Uzziah
prepared for them
throughout all the host
shields, and spears, and
helmets, and habergeons,
and bows, and slings to
cast stones. 15 And he
made in Jerusalem
ENGINES, INVENTED BY
CUNNING MEN, to be on
the towers and upon the
bulwarks, TO SHOOT
ARROWS AND GREAT STONES
withal.
Uzziah,
spoken of in this verse,
was king over 100 years
BEFORE the destruction
of Jerusalem, and we
here learn that they had
"engines" on
the "towers"
and "bulwarks"
which shot
"arrows" and
"great
stones". Catapults
were capable of reaching
over 1,000 feet, and
therefore Ron reasoned
that the siege wall
would have been
positioned out of the
range of these massive
devices, and therefore,
further from the city
wall than the site he
had pointed to.
He
finally concluded:
1) the Ark had to have
been hidden between the
18th year of Josiah,
(when we are told he had
it taken to Solomon's
temple), and 35 years
later, when the temple
was destroyed;
2)
it was NOT taken to
Babylon, based on the
information from the
Scriptures which told
what went to Babylon
& what was returned;
3)
it was most likely
hidden just prior to the
destruction of the
temple, when Jerusalem
was surrounded by the
Babylonian siege wall;
and
4)
it was hidden
somewhere within the
confines of the city
wall of Jerusalem and
the Babylonian siege
wall. The entire
city AND the temple were
destroyed in 586 BC by
the Babylonians, so the
Ark could have only
escaped destruction or
captivity by NOT being
anywhere in the city. Again,
the site he had pointed
to was, he believed,
outside of the ancient
city wall and within the
siege wall. It was
supposition based on
study, but still only
supposition. Yet, it was
enough to base a
decision on - he decided
to go ahead with the
excavation.
The
Ark in the Apocrypha
He
decided to see if any
mention was found in any
non-Biblical records,
especially Jewish. He
found 2 intriguing
instances. In the
Apocryphal book of 2
Maccabees, we read:
2
Mac 2:2 The records show
that it was Jeremiah
who... 4,... prompted by
a divine message, the
prophet gave orders that
the Tent of Meeting and
the Ark should go with
him. Then he went to the
mountain from the top of
which Moses saw God's
promised land. 5 When he
reached the mountain,
Jeremiah found a
cave-dwelling; he
carried the tent, the
Ark, and the incense
altar into it, then
blocked up the entrance.
6 Some of his companions
came to mark out the
way, but were unable to
find it. 7 When Jeremiah
learned of this he
reprimanded them. `The
place shall remain
unknown', he said,
`until God finally
gathers His people
together and shows mercy
to them. 8 Then the Lord
will bring these things
to light again, and the
glory of the Lord will
appear with the cloud,
as it was seen both in
the time of Moses, and
when Solomon prayed that
the shrine might be
worthily consecrated.
The writer, in this
letter to "Jewish
kinsmen in Egypt, the
Jews who are in
Jerusalem, and those in
the country of Judaea",
explains where he got
this information:
"These
same facts are set out
in the official records
and in the memoirs of
Nehemiah. Just as
Nehemiah collected the
chronicles of the kings,
the writings of
prophets, the works of
David, and royal letters
about sacred offerings,
to found his library, so
Judas also has collected
all the books that had
been scattered as a
result of our recent
conflict. These are in
our possession, and if
you need any of them,
send messengers for
them."
Also
worthy of note: the
quote in 2 Maccabees,
above, could have been
mis-translated over the
years and originally
have stated that the Ark
was hidden NOT IN
the mountain Moses was
ON when he viewed the
promised land (Mt. Nebo,
Deu. 32:49), but instead
it could mean that the
Ark was hidden IN the
mountain that Moses SAW
when he viewed the
promised land. From Nebo
he would have been able
to see Jerusalem because
of it's altitude.
In
the Pseudepigraphal book
called "The
Paralipomena of
Jeremiah" (meaning
"the remaining
words of Jeremiah")
it is also written that
Jeremiah, in obedience
to God's command, hid
the sacred objects from
the temple just before
the destruction of
Jerusalem. Now, neither
of these books are to be
trusted as completely
accurate - however, they
do show a strong
tradition that has
Jeremiah hiding, or
having someone else
hide, the Ark and other
objects from the temple.
Is
there any truth in these
2 books? Perhaps - since
Jeremiah WAS the prophet
in Jerusalem during the
time of Josiah (when the
Ark was brought back
into the temple) and he
continued through to the
time of the destruction
of Jerusalem, it is
logical to believe it possible
that God directed him to
have the Ark and other
sacred items hidden.
Also,
Jeremiah, himself,
wrote:
JER
3:16 And it shall come
to pass, when ye be
multiplied and increased
in the land, in those
days, saith the LORD,
they shall say no more,
The ark of the covenant
of the LORD: neither
shall it come to mind:
neither shall they
remember it; neither
shall they visit it;
neither shall that be
done any more.
The
implication here is that
at the time he wrote
this - (during the reign
of Josiah, v. 6), - they
still had the Ark in
their possession. This
entire passage, which
begins with verse 6, is
a plea to return from
their apostasy, although
their captivity was
already foretold by
Isaiah. Therefore, could
this above verse about
the Ark of the Covenant
be a prediction that
they no longer will have
it when they return from
captivity? Just 2 verses
later, he writes:
JER
3:18 IN THOSE DAYS the
house of Judah shall
walk with the house of
Israel, and THEY SHALL
COME TOGETHER OUT OF THE
LAND OF THE NORTH to the
land that I have given
for an inheritance unto
your fathers.
The
"land of the
north" was Babylon
where they would soon
spend 70 years in
captivity. If this
understanding is
correct, it indicates
that Jeremiah DID have
knowledge that they
would no longer have the
Ark when they returned
from Babylon.
But
also important to note
is that he CLEARLY
indicated that "neither
shall that be done
ANYMORE", which
is proof that there is
no promise of it ever
being reinstated.
In
fact, in Ezekiel, when
he gives the
instructions for the
temple, he gives NO
instructions which
included the Ark. It was
never mentioned.
Since
Jerusalem was surrounded
by the Babylonian siege
wall during the time the
Ark seemed to have
disappeared, Ron
believed it may have
been possible for
someone to have taken it
to a location within the
siege wall and not be
detected. The quotes we
read above agree with
the "time",
but we just don't know
for sure - and again,
these books are not
inspired so we cannot
rely on them.
The
Location of the
Excavation

Jerusalem
is situated on 2 hills,
traditionally referred
to as "Mt. Moriah"
and Mt. Zion". To
the extreme right can be
seen the beginning of
the Mt. of Olives.
"Moriah"
is mentioned only twice
in the Bible - first as
the place Abraham was
told to take Isaac and
offer him as a
sacrifice, and second as
the place where the
temple was built:
GEN
22:2 And he said, Take
now thy son, thine only
son Isaac, whom thou
lovest, and get thee
into the land of
Moriah; and offer
him there for a burnt
offering upon one of
the mountains which I
will tell thee of.
2CH
3:1 Then Solomon began
to build the house of
the LORD at Jerusalem in
mount Moriah, where
the Lord appeared unto
David his father, in the
place that David had
prepared in the
threshingfloor of Ornan
the Jebusite.
The
quarry which contains
the site Ron was to
excavate is part of the
northern extension of
Mt. Moriah. On the east,
south and west sides of
Jerusalem are very deep
valleys which protect
the city from foreign
invaders.
But
on this north side, they
were vulnerable.
Therefore, a "dry
moat" or trench was
quarried out of
"Mt. Moriah"
on the north side to
prevent an enemy from
being able to simply
reach and break through
the wall along this
ridge.
Then,
at some unknown point in
time, the northern
portion of "Moriah",
now separated from the
city, was used as a
stone quarry. Starting
on the south end of this
now separated part of
"Moriah", on
the western side, stone
was cut out of the
mountain, lowering the
ground level to that of
the trench which extends
just outside of the
north wall.

The
site Ron pointed to was
along the quarried face
(escarpment) of
"Mt. Moriah".
This cliff-face is
referred to by some as
"the Calvary
escarpment" because
it contains the
"skull-face"
that many believe was
"Golgotha" or
"Calvary"
where Christ was
crucified.
It
also contains the site
traditionally called
"Jeremiah's
Grotto", the
"Garden Tomb"
(where many believe
Christ was buried) and
St. Etienne which
contains a large complex
of Jewish tombs dating
to the 1st and 2nd
temple periods cut into
the side of the
mountain.
The
escarpment is many
hundreds of feet long.
And it was Ron's belief
that this WAS the
general area of the
crucifixion, and the
Garden Tomb, he also
believed, was indeed
that of Joseph of
Arimathaea which had
once held the body of
Christ. But these things
were not related to this
project. He was now
searching for the Ark of
the Covenant.
The
Excavation Begins
It
was January, 1979 when
Ron and the boys
returned to Jerusalem.
Snow was on the ground.
He now had to decide how
and where to begin. The
site he had pointed to
was being used as a
trash dump and appeared
to hold very little
promise to the human
eye. It was located
along this escarpment
where the ground met the
cliff-face. He had
investigated the area
adjacent to the
escarpment and realized
that the ground was
raised to a much higher
level today, which meant
that the rock floor was
many, many feet below
the present ground
level.
In
the past, Jerusalem has
been destroyed many,
many times. And the
customary method of
rebuilding these ancient
cities was to simply
build on top of the
destruction level.
Today, the debris is
removed before
rebuilding, but not so
back then. This is why
archaeologists are able
to find evidences of
many cities which have
existed on the same site
- they simply excavate
through each successive
level down to the next
until they reach bedrock
- which indicates that
they have reached the
first city to be
established on that
particular site.
The
site Ron was to excavate
had a ground level many
feet higher than the
quarry floor to the
south before the city
wall. So, he and the
boys could do nothing
but begin to dig
straight down.
The
original location that
he had pointed to in
1978 contained an
extremely large boulder
just barely exposed
above the surface, and
Ron decided to begin
digging several yards to
the right. It was to be
a job of mammoth
proportions - Ron, Danny
and Ronny, would
eventually remove many
tons of rock and debris,
having to sift through
all of it for any
artifacts. This was a
requirement of the
Department of
Antiquities which they
would always comply
with.
First
Discovery - The
Crucifixion Site?
They
dug straight down along
the cliff face, forming
a steep wall with the
earth they removed.
Almost immediately, Ron
noticed a
"shelf-like"
niche cut into the face
of the cliff. Digging
down further, he
discovered there were 3
of these
"niches" cut
into the face of the
cliff with a smaller one
on the right side.

He
was convinced that these
were cut into the
cliff-face to hold
"signs" or
notices. And because of
the location - in the
vicinity of the
"skull-face",
and because there were 3
of these, he believed
they were where the
notices stating the
crime of the crucifixion
victim in 3 languages
were placed.

He
had studied the
available information on
Roman crucifixions and
had discovered that they
used this form of
punishment as a
deterrent. The
well-known quote of
Quintillian explains:
"Whenever
we crucify criminals,
very crowded highways
are chosen, so that many
shall see it and may be
moved by fear of it,
because all punishment
does not pertain so much
to revenge as to
example".
Roman
crucifixions consisted
of 3 basic elements, all
perfectly described in
the account of the
crucifixion of Christ -
first, the scourging;
then the carrying of the
crossbeam by the
condemned to the site;
and finally the nailing
or binding of the
condemned to the
cross-beam and then
attaching this beam onto
the upright post and
setting it up.
But
another element was also
involved. In order to be
a deterrent, the CRIME
of the victim had to be
posted in clear sight of
the passers-by. For this
purpose, they used a titilus,
which was a board
covered with gypsum,
inscribed with black
letters. This was
usually carried ahead of
the victim on the way to
the crucifixion, and
then posted above the
cross in clear sight.
The
common conception about
Christ's crucifixion was
that a single sign
written by Pilate was
nailed to His cross
above His head. This may
very well have been -
however, in order for
the passers-by to be
able to read these
signs, written in 3
different languages,
they would have had to
have been quite large -
much larger than a
hand-written notice on a
paper.
Just
recently we learned a
great deal about the
visibility of signs at
our new museum. We put
up signs that looked
very large to us (6
& 8 inch letters)
but when we placed them
on our building and
walked across the
street, or even to the
end of the parking lot,
we discovered that they
were very difficult to
read. A sign written by
Pilate on a piece of
paper, nailed to a
cross, would have been
almost impossible to
read even by those
standing directly in
front of the cross. Add
to this the fact that in
Jerusalem, 3 different
languages were common -
Hebrew, Greek and Latin,
- and it becomes
apparent that the signs
above Christ's head were
much larger than we have
commonly believed.

When
Ron read and reread the
accounts of these signs
at Christ's crucifixion,
he discovered that
although they had been
translated to read
"ON the
cross", the Greek
could just as accurately
have been translated
"above the
cross" or "over
the cross".
MAT
27:35 And they crucified
him,... 36 And sitting
down they watched him
there; 37 And set up
over his head his
accusation written, HIS
IS JESUS THE KING OF THE
JEWS.
JOH
19:17 And he bearing his
cross went forth into a
place called the place
of a skull, which is
called in the Hebrew
Golgotha: 18 Where they
crucified him, and two
other with him, on
either side one, and
Jesus in the midst. 19
And Pilate wrote a
title, and put it on
the cross. And the
writing was JESUS OF
NAZARETH THE KING OF THE
JEWS. 20 This title then
read many of the Jews:
for the place where
Jesus was crucified was
nigh to the city: and it
was written in Hebrew,
and Greek, and Latin.
In
the above quote from
John it states that the
"title" was
put "on" the
cross - the Greek word
here translated to read
"on" is "epi".
In Luke, this following
verse also tells about
the same
"title", but
here, the word "epi"
is translated to read
"over":
LUK
23:38 And a
superscription also was
written over him
in letters of Greek, and
Latin, and Hebrew, THIS
IS THE KING OF THE JEWS.
"Epi",
here translated to read
"over",
certainly could NOT be
translated to read
"on" here! This
same word, "epi",
is also translated in
other places to read
"above" -
therefore, the
Scriptures do not
specifically state that
the "title"
was nailed onto the
physical cross. All it
states for sure is that
the "title(s)"
were placed
"over",
"above",
"about", etc.,
the cross.
So
with this understanding,
and the information on
Roman crucifixions and
the titilus
covered in gypsum and
written in black ink
that the Romans were
known to use, he felt
his conclusion was at
least not to be ruled
out. Little did he
suspect how it would
later be so incredibly
confirmed.
When
he first found the
niches, Ron placed
boards in them for
demonstration purposes.
Digging deeper, and
showing that there were
no more niches below
these, he had signs
painted in the 3
languages which they set
up and photographed. He
believed the much
smaller niche was for
the ever-present Roman
eagle. But again, this
wasn't the purpose of
this excavation so they
continued to dig.
Second
Discovery - The
"Stoning
Ground"
As
they continued to dig
straight down, the cliff
face was on one side,
forming a solid wall.
But on the other side,
the earth wall began to
exhibit signs of
instability and Ron
feared that it would
soon collapse, perhaps
burying them in the
hole. He decided that
they should move back
along the cliff-face to
the original site that
he had pointed to. He
dreaded it because of
the huge boulder he had
found just under the
surface - but he felt he
had no choice.
Back
to the Original Site
Ron
had felt justified in
beginning the excavation
several yards from the
original site, because
it was in the same
general area. And with
the discovery of the
niches, he was satisfied
that it hadn't been a
completely wasted effort
- but still he had
another purpose for this
excavation.
As
they began to dig around
the huge boulder
extending out from the
original site, he
discovered that here was
enough room behind it
(between it and the
cliff-face) to begin
their dig. As they began
to dig downward, they
very soon came upon
another item of
interest. Carved out of
the cliff-face was a
hole which extended
through a section of
protruding rock allowing
a rope or similar object
to be threaded through
it. The great care
obviously devoted to
chiseling out this
object indicated that it
had an important use,
but they would learn
that later.

The
first site they had
begun excavating was
where the cliff-face was
relatively vertical like
a wall. Here, the
cliff-face slanted
inward, forming a
"roof" over
the place they were
digging. As they dug
down into the earth,
they found open areas
beneath the surface
which contained a large
amount of pottery
shards, and even a few
pieces still intact.
A
Grain Storage Bin later
Used as a Cistern
They
reached bedrock 38 feet
below the present ground
surface. Carefully
removing debris, they
found themselves in an
approximately 15 foot
diameter round chamber
carved out of the rock
with steps chiseled into
the shaft descending
from the top in a spiral
to the bottom. At some
point in time it had
been modified and
plastered, reused as a
cistern. Either of these
explanations would
explain the presence of
the "rope
hole" chiseled in
the cliff-face (see the
above photo) - it was
for the rope that held
the bucket or jug which
was lowered down into
the shaft to retrieve
grain or water.
Ron
chiseled through the
plaster and found a
large amount of pottery
among the dirt and
debris used as fill to
form the cistern. When
he turned these pottery
pieces in to Antiquities
and they examined them,
they informed Ron that
some of them date back
to the Jebusite time
(before David took the
city). The latest dated
specimens were from the
Roman period, which
tells us that the grain
bin was plastered during
Roman times.

As
exciting as these
discoveries were, again
they weren't what Ron
was looking for.
Tunneling
Along the Cliff-Face
As
they descended through
the earth and debris,
they were able to
distinguish the Roman
level because of the
pottery and coins. Ron
decided again that he
needed to keep looking -
that these things were
not the object of his
search. They covered up
the circular shaft,
careful to preserve
everything, and began to
tunnel under the present
ground level along the
cliff-face on the Roman
level back in the
direction of the first
site they had begun to
excavate. Ron was
looking for an entrance
into a cave or tunnel in
the now underground
cliff-face. But his next
discovery was so
gruesome that it still
reflects in his face
when he talks about it.
The
"Stoning
Ground"
The
grain shaft/cistern was
cut into the solid rock.
When Ron began his
tunnel back in the
direction of the cut-out
niches, he found that
the rock floor abruptly
ended about 3 to 4 feet
from the edge of the
shaft. Digging a 3 foot
shaft straight down, he
found a massive amount
of fist-sized and larger
rocks. As he sorted
through them, he found
several human bones, in
particular some finger
bones. He believed he
knew what this
represented - while it
is common to find rocks
in an excavation, it is
NOT common to find them
of this particular size
in such a massive pile.
It certainly wasn't a
tomb - and the
disarticulated bones
among the large rocks
led Ron to only one
conclusion - this has
been the "stoning
ground"
ACT
6:57 Then they cried out
with a loud voice, and
stopped their ears, and
ran upon him with one
accord, 58 And CAST HIM
[Stephen] OUT OF THE
CITY, AND STONED HIM:
Third
Discovery - A First
Century Building
When
Ron realized what he had
found, he quickly
climbed back up the
shaft he had dug and he
and the boys continued
their tunnel back in the
direction of the first
site. Soon, they found
the remains of a buried
structure. This building
was built directly
adjacent to the
cliff-face and a portion
of the back wall
extended along the
actual face of the
cliff. The foundations
of the building were
still in place.

As
Ron studied the best
preserved sections, he
discovered a hewn stone
extending out
horizontally from the
wall against the cliff
face - his first
impression was that it
was an altar. It
displayed smooth wear on
its top.

It
was below and in front
of this "altar
stone" that Ron
noticed a very unusual
large rock. When he
examined the rock
closer, he saw that it
was covered in
travertine - travertine
is formed when
underground acified
water seeps through
preexisting limestone
and dissolves calcium
carbonate; as this water
containing calcium
carbonate flows over
objects and begins to
evaporate or lose it's
carbon dioxide, this
dissolved limestone is
redeposited in the form
of stalactites and
stalagmites, flowstone,
etc. In this case, it
was redeposited in the
form of a coating over
the rock which can be
clearly seen, when
examining the rock in
person, in the layering
of the coating.

Ron
thought this rock was
much too symmetrical to
be a natural-shaped
rock, so he decided to
pick it up and examine
it more closely. When he
lifted it, he discovered
that it was covering a
squarish hole chiseled
into the bedrock.

(The
dark object at the top
of the squarish hole is
a crow-bar extending
downward into the hole.)
The
Hole that Held the
Cross?
As
should be expected,
there was a great deal
of dirt and debris
everywhere. As he
examined this hole and
cleared away the dirt
around it, he discovered
that it had a large
crack extending out from
it.
As
they removed more dirt
and debris, he
discovered a
platform-like shelf of
bedrock which extended
out about 8 feet from
the face of the cliff,
and this squarish hole
was chiseled in this
"shelf". There
were no more holes in
the platform-like shelf,
so he began digging into
the packed earth in
front of and level with
the
"platform".
It
was about 4 feet before
he came to the lower
level of bedrock, and
here he uncovered 3 more
squarish holes chiseled
in the rock in front of
this
"platform".
His measurements showed
that the elevated
"platform"
with the squarish hole
and crack were located
14 feet directly below
the 3 cut-out niches in
the face of the cliff,
now above ground level.
His
earlier conclusion that
the cut-out niches were
for the signs stating
the crucifixion victim's
crime in the 3 languages
of Jerusalem was now
supported by the fact
that he had found more
square holes, all about
12 to 13 inches square,
cut into the bedrock -
holes he firmly believed
once held crosses. The
one elevated above the
rest (on the shelf-like
platform of bedrock), he
believed, held the cross
upon which Christ was
crucified.

The
building structure that
remained intact showed
that a building covered
the entire site. He
concluded, based on the
evidence they'd found,
that a Christian church
had been built over the
place of the crucifixion
of Christ - the stone
wall extended along the
cliff-face directly
behind the cross-hole
that was on the
"platform-like" shelf of
bedrock. It appeared
that this was the place
where the "featured"
criminal-victim was
crucified, being
elevated several feet
above those crucified
around him.
The
"altar stone" was set in
the stone wall,
extending out
horizontally almost
directly above the
elevated cross-hole with
the crack.
The "Crack" in the
Cross-Hole
The
crack extending out from
the cross-hole on the
elevated "platform"
appeared to Ron to have
been caused by an
earthquake - it
displayed no evidence of
being chiseled. (See
above color photo which
shows this crack.)
As he
removed debris from the
cross-hole, he finally
reached the bottom and
measured it - it
extended 23 inches into
the solid bedrock, while
the crack appeared to
extend much deeper. But
at this time, he didn't
attempt to clear it out
nor did he measure it.
It would be over a year
later before he would
learn that the crack
extended about 20 feet
into the bedrock.
"Dating" the Remains of
the Building
He
found coins during the
course of the excavation
which helped to narrow
the date of the
building. He found a
Roman coin with Emperor
Tiberius who was Emperor
from 14 to 37 AD, which
was the earliest dated
coin they found. The
latest coins were from
about 135 AD, but no
later. This is
consistent with the
known history of
Jerusalem and placed the
date of the building
between the time of the
crucifixion and 135 AD.
But
further information
indicates that it was
most likely built after
70 AD. Prior to 70 AD,
(when the city and the
temple were completely
destroyed by the Roman
general, Titus),
Jerusalem was still
under Roman rule and the
crucifixion grounds
would have remained in
use. Josephus tells how
Titus, during his siege
of Jerusalem, had as
many as 500 people a day
crucified (Wars of the
Jews, Book V, Chapter
XI, para. 1).
After
70 AD - No More Mass
Crucifixions
But after the
destruction in 70 AD,
with most of the Jewish
inhabitants having been
killed or sold as
slaves, the city was
reduced to a Roman camp.
Vespasian offered the
landed property of
Jerusalem for sale to
foreigners, although we
have no records of who
purchased any land
there. The garrison of
800 Romans in the camp
was stationed there to
insure that the city was
not rebuilt. The hatred
of the Romans was for
the Jews. Therefore,
during the time after 70
AD, when Jerusalem was
only a Roman camp with
the occasional foreigner
(non-Jew) living in the
area, the use of
crucifixion would be
virtually eliminated.
The Christians were
apparently tolerated by
the Romans, as is
supported by the fact
that in 130 AD, when the
Emperor Hadrian came to
Jerusalem to rebuild it
as a Roman city named
Aelia Capitolina, he
showed favor to the
Christians while
forbidding any Jew to
ever set foot in the
city again.
This and other things
contributed to a revolt
among the Jews in Judea
in 132 AD which finally
resulted in the death of
at least half a million
Jewish men, and from
this time on, Judea was
no longer called by that
name, but referred to by
the old name of
"Palestine".
The new Roman city of
Aelia Capitolina
remained a city, but did
not prosper. The fact
that the coins Ron found
in the ancient building
cease at about 135 AD
indicates that whoever
built and used this
ancient structure
apparently abandoned it
at that time and left
the region. The fact
that the foundations are
still intact indicates
that it didn't suffer
destruction at the hands
of an invader, but most
likely fell into disuse
and decay. Eventually,
over time, it was
covered in dirt and
debris. Whatever was the
case, the evidence shows
that the structures were
not disturbed since the
Roman time.
A "Very Great Stone"
from a "Very
Special Tomb"
As
they continued to clear
the area outward from
the cliff-face, the
layout of the building
was found to be very
simple. One wall ran
parallel to the
cliff-face, along the
top of the elevated
"platform"
section of bedrock. Two
exterior walls extended
out at 90 degree angles
from each end of this
first wall.
They
began to dig, searching
for the last wall when
they came to another
hand-hewn rock. It was a
little less than 2 feet
thick, and the portion
that was extending out
of the dirt and debris
looked as if it were
curved, somewhat like a
large, thick rounded
table-top. Clearing more
from around it, Ron saw
that it was of immense
size and they decided
not to continue digging.
He theorized that
perhaps this was the
seal-stone from the tomb
of Joseph of Arimathaea
in which Christ was
buried. If he was
correct in his
conjecture that this was
an early Christian
church building, perhaps
they had incorporated
this seal-stone into the
actual building. It
certainly appeared to be
larger than any seal
stone he had ever seen
or read about. The
largest that had ever
been found, to his
knowledge, was 5 feet in
diameter. THIS stone
would far exceed that.

However,
it would be several
years later before he
would learn it's true
dimension - a little
over 13 feet in diameter
- when he used
sub-surface interface
radar from above the
ground.
MAT
27:60 And laid it in his
own new tomb, which he
had hewn out in the
rock: and he rolled A
GREAT STONE to the door
of the sepulcher, and
departed.
"In
the Garden a New
Sepulcher"
In
the same escarpment is
the Garden Tomb which
was discovered in 1867
when the landowner was
digging a cistern on his
property. As with the
sites Ron was
excavating, this tomb
was beneath the ground
level, buried in the
debris of many, many
years.
When
the owner discovered the
tomb, he abandoned his
plans for a cistern.
When General Gordon of
Britain visited the area
and became convinced
that the "skull
face" in the
relatively near section
of the escarpment was
the true location of
Golgotha, this tomb
became the prime suspect
for being the tomb of
Christ. It met with
strenuous opposition
from the traditionalists
who were adamant that
the Holy Sepulcher
inside the city was the
true site - but it soon
gained some adherents.

When
completely excavated, it
did indeed exhibit
characteristics which
proved it was dated to
the 1st century AD, the
time of Christ. But the
subject that now
concerns us is the
missing seal-stone from
this tomb.
Directly
in front of the tomb is
a groove for a rolling
stone. The width of this
groove is about 2 feet,
the correct size for the
stone Ron found buried
in the earth.


(Above
- "groove in front
of "Garden
Tomb")
Another
tomb from the 1st
century (time of Christ)
is that of Queen Helena
of Adiabene. It is also
located in the same
general vicinity,
further north, and the
groove is exactly the
same size as is featured
in the Garden Tomb. Not
only are the grooves for
the seal stones
identical in size, hers
also contains an
inclined section at one
end at which the stone
was rolled into the
groove - exactly as does
the Garden Tomb.
Breaking
Through the
Cliff-Face into the
Cave System
By
this time, Ron and the
boys had been working
here for almost 2 years.
They had begun in
January of 1979 and it
was now late 1980.
Of
course, they weren't
working constantly - Ron
was an anesthetist with
obligations to the
hospitals he worked
with. Due to the nature
of his work, he was able
to arrange to come over
numerous times a year,
but he could only stay
for a few weeks at a
time.
And
Ron was getting anxious.
They had made some
wonderful discoveries,
and provided details to
the authorities of their
finds along with any
artifacts they found.
Some, they were allowed
to keep because they
were deemed of no
significant worth.
But
they had explored the
entire underground
cliff-face, looking for
an entrance into a cave
or tunnel. If the Ark
was in that location, it
certainly would be
hidden in a cave, he
reasoned.
Finally,
as they continued to
search, Ron made the
comment to his sons that
he was
"impressed"
that they should just
break through the rock
of the cliff-face. Ronny
said he thought that was
a good idea, but Ron
resisted. That rock is
extremely hard and he
knew what difficult work
it would be. Finally,
when Danny told his
father that he, too,
believed they ought to
do go ahead and break
through the cliff face,
Ron relented and agreed.
It was the only option
left.
With
hammers and chisels,
they began their work.
It wasn't long before
they broke through the
rock into an open space.
Enlarging the hole, they
saw behind it a cave
which was about 15 feet
in height and of about
the same width. Crawling
through, they finally
were inside the actual
mountain called "Moriah".
Inside
the Cave System
For
almost 2 years, they had
been tunneling
underground, finding
artifacts and uncovering
exciting structures
almost daily. But now,
they were in a barren
cavern that they would
soon learn was only a
very small part of a
very extensive honeycomb
of natural caves and
tunnels within the
mountain.

For
almost a year, they
explored this area,
finding no evidence of
any human presence.
These natural tunnels
were not all connected
to each other, and they
spent many hours
chiseling through cave
walls, searching for
adjacent tunnels which
they eventually found.
But they found nothing
else.

As
1981 came to an end, Ron
and the boys took their
winter holidays to come
to Jerusalem and work.
Even though it is cold
there in the winter, the
cave system was always a
very comfortable and
constant temperature,
both in summer as well
as winter. But the work
was beginning to take a
toll on all 3 of them.
They all began to
develop a fever and
slight chills. The dust
they had inhaled over
the years in those
confined tunnels perhaps
contributed to their
pneumonia-like symptoms.
Finally, on Christmas
eve, Ron had to send
Ronny back to the US
because he was so ill.
Danny had to follow on
New Year's eve. Ron, too
was sick but this was a
very special trip.
The
Incredible Discovery
Expectant
after what happened to
"James", he
looked at his watch - it
was 2:00 pm, Wednesday,
January 6, 1982. Shining
his flashlight down
through the massive pile
of large rocks, his eye
caught a glimpse of
something shiny.
He
began slowly removing
the rocks one at a time
and discovered some
dry-rotted wooden
timbers just beneath the
rocks, and then some
dry-rotted remains of
animals skins that
turned to powder when he
moved them. The animals
skins were covering a
gold veneered table with
a raised molding around
the side which consisted
of an alternating
pattern of a bell and a
pomegranate. It only
took him a moment to
realize that at the
least this WAS an object
from the first temple!
But he was in such a
confined space, he
couldn't uncover the
entire table. He later
concluded, after closer
examination, that this
was the Table of
Shewbread.
The
Discovery of the
Earthquake Crack in the
Ceiling
With
adrenalin flowing
through his veins and
great anticipation, he
looked around to see
what else he could see,
which wasn't much. He
shined his flashlight
around the open area and
then up to the ceiling.
There, he saw something
that caught his eye - it
was a crack in the
ceiling with a black
substance within the
crack.
Crawling
slowly and painfully
over the rocks to the
rear of the chamber, he
saw a stone case
extending through the
rocks. It had a flat
stone top which was
cracked completely in
two and the smaller
section was moved aside,
creating an opening into
the stone case. But the
top was too near the
ceiling for him to look
inside. Yet he knew what
was inside - the crack
in the ceiling was
directly above the
cracked part of the lid,
where it was open, and
the black substance had
fallen from the crack
into the case because
some of it had splashed
onto the lid.
It
was at this time, as Ron
recalls, as the instant
realization of what had
happened here dawned on
him, that he passed out.
When he realized that
the crack in the ceiling
was the end of the crack
he had found in the
elevated cross-hole many
feet above him, and the
black substance was
blood which had fallen
through the crack and
into the stone case, he
KNEW the Ark was in the
stone case. But the most
overwhelming realization
was that Christ's Blood
had actually fallen onto
the Mercy Seat.

When
he came to, it was 2:45
pm. A mere 45 minutes
had passed since he
entered the chamber, yet
in that short time, he
became the first witness
to the literal
fulfillment of the
"type"
represented by all the
sacrifices made by God's
people since Adam and
Eve, and later
specifically directed by
God, Himself, in the
laws of the sacrificial
system.
Now
he knew why he and the
boys had to do the last
3 years of excavation
that he had sometimes
felt was useless. If
they had not found
first, the cut-out
niches, and then the
elevated cross-hole with
the earthquake crack, he
would not have
recognized what had
happened here. And the
promise Ron believed he
had received HAD been
fulfilled - he DID find
the Ark of the Covenant
on that trip. But he
didn't even lay eyes on
it. And in his
frustration and
complaining, he received
another VERY strong
impression - "I
only promised that you
would FIND it. It will
come out when the time
is right."
The
condition of the
chamber, completely full
within 18 inches of the
ceiling, made it
impossible for Ron to do
anything else. He could
not foresee any possible
way of bringing anything
out unless the entrance
to the chamber through
which the objects were
originally taken in was
found. He climbed out
the small hole, back
through the tortuous
series of tunnels and
sealed the passageway
with a stone. To anyone
looking through the
tunnel, it would appear
that it came to an
abrupt end. However, the
rock could and would be
easily removed by Ron
when he returned.
Ron
didn't report his
experience to anyone at
that time. He needed
time to think and it
would be a long time
before his mind quit
whirring with everything
he had experienced. He
had expected to find the
Ark and bring it out,
but that now seemed
impossible.
He
made several more trips
into the chamber, and
eventually reported to
the authorities as to
what he had found.
Perhaps not able to
believe what he had told
them he had found, or
perhaps recognizing the
problems that this could
cause if made known, his
superiors told him not
to tell anyone about his
discovery. However, it
was too late for that
because Ron had already
told a few people and he
confessed this fact to
them. Realizing that
"what is done is
done", they then
ordered him not to
reveal any MORE details
than he already had
revealed. Therefore,
from this point on, we
cannot be as specific as
we have to this point.
The
Chamber with the Ark of
the Covenant
Verifying
that the Ark was in the
Stone Case
Ron
returned to the chamber
on several occasions -
one time he took a
"Trinkle
Drill" used by
Orthopedic surgeons and
a colonoscope used to
look into the human
body. He wanted to be
sure the Ark was in that
stone case. He tried to
drill a small hole with
the "Trinkle
Drill" but it
wouldn't penetrate the
stone. So he took his
star-tipped stone chisel
and hammer to accomplish
the job. He would hammer
the tip a little, then
turn the bit, hammer
then turn, over and over
until he had an
approximately 5/8"
hole into the stone
case.
The
"colonoscope"
is an optical device
with a powerful light
source which allows
doctors to peer into the
human body, and Ron had
borrowed one from one of
the doctors at the
hospital he worked at.
Inserting the
colonoscope through the
tiny hole, he guided it
downward, rotating the
lens until he saw what
he recognized as the
bottom of the
crown-molding around the
top of the Mercy Seat
and then he saw the flat
golden side. Since the
colonoscope doesn't
allow viewing of a large
area, and since he had
little means to guide it
other than a small
latitude of rotation, he
couldn't see a great
deal. But he saw enough
to KNOW it was the Ark.
Measuring
the Depth of the
Earthquake Crack
On
one trip, he had one of
his helpers sit by the
elevated cross-hole with
the earthquake crack
while he ran a metal
tape measure through the
crack in the ceiling of
the chamber. It extended
through to the
cross-hole and when his
helper grabbed it to
show that it had come
through, Ron noted that
the crack extended
through 20 feet of solid
rock.
The
Contents of the Chamber
During
his several visits to
the chamber, he tried to
thoroughly explore the
contents. He measured
the chamber and found it
to be 22 feet long by 12
feet on 2 sides, while
the other 2 sides
followed the line of the
cliff-face, forming a
chamber that narrowed
down in one corner.
The
objects he saw in that
chamber that he feels
confident in identifying
are: the Ark of the
Covenant in the Stone
case;
the
Table of Shewbread;
the
Golden Altar of
Incense that was
in front of the
veil;
the
Golden Censer;
the
7-branched
Candlestick
holder, (which
didn't have
candles but had
tiny, bowlike
golden oil lamps
which are built
into the tips of
the candlestick);
a
very large sword;
an
Ephod;
a
Miter with an
ivory pomegranate
on the tip;
a
brass shekel
weight; numerous
oil lamps;
and
a brass ring which
appeared to be for
hanging a curtain
or something
similar. There
are more objects,
but these are all
Ron could
positively
identify. All of
these objects were
covered by the
dry-rotted
dark-colored
animal skins, then
dry-rotten wooden
timbers on top of
the skins, and
finally the large
rocks piled over
everything.
The
Tables of Stone are
still within the Ark,
under the Mercy Seat. On
the back of the Ark is a
small open cubicle which
still contains the
"Book of the
Law" and is
presumably the one
Moses, himself, wrote.
To the best of his
knowledge, the Book of
Genesis is not there -
only Exodus, Numbers,
Leviticus, Deuteronomy.
The thing that amazed
Ron was that these
Scrolls, written on
animal skins, are in
perfect condition today.
Oil
Lamps Inside the Chamber
Just
inside the chamber, by
and near the original
entrance which was now
sealed up, he found a
total of 7 oil lamps
that Ron believes had to
have been left behind by
those who brought the
items into the chamber.
The soot on the lamps
and the rocks they sat
upon clearly showed the
direction of the breeze
that followed them into
the tunnel.
One
of the lamps is very
ornate and displays
Assyrian
characteristics, which
is consistent with the
cultural influence of
Judea at the time just
prior to the Babylonian
captivity. The picture
(below) of this
particular oil lamp was
not taken with a camera
because the design on
the lamp doesn't show up
well in a photo. This
picture was made by
placing the lamp on a
copier and it revealed a
little of the design,
which we find very
interesting.

The
center depicts a goat or
a ram standing upon it's
hind legs, eating from a
grape vine. This scene
is very similar to the
statue found in a grave
in the Sumerian city of
Ur. The suggestion has
been made that this may
represent the ram caught
in the thicket at the
very moment that Abraham
was about to sacrifice
his son, Isaac, which
served as the substitute
sacrifice, sparing
Isaac's life - a
"shadow" of
the coming Messiah.
It
is an interesting
thought to consider the
possibility of a
relationship between the
design on the lamp and
the story of the
"ram in the
thicket" that was
the substitute sacrifice
- because the lamp was
left in a chamber INSIDE
Mt. Moriah where Abraham
had brought Isaac to
offer him as a
sacrifice; and this same
Mt. Moriah was where the
Messiah died, the
"substitute"
sacrifice for fallen
mankind. But this is
just interesting
conjecture on my part.
Sealing
the Passageway to the
Chamber
After his
last visit to the
chamber through the hole
he had chiseled, he
permanently sealed the
tunnel through which
they first entered. Ron
has learned many lessons
over the years, and some
he had to learn the hard
way. One lesson he
learned this way was
that he had to be very
careful whom he shared
his information with.
During
the course of their work
there, they had numerous
experiences with people
which could have been
disastrous without
"Divine Intervention".
For example, one famous
evangelist stumbled upon
the hole into the
excavation one day and
Ron invited him to come
down into the cave.
Believing the man to be
honest, Ron told him
what they were searching
for and big promises
were made of assistance.
To make a long story
short, a team of
individuals from this
evangelist's group later
returned to the site,
telling the authorities
they were with the Wyatt
expedition and that Ron
would arrive in a few
days (which wasn't
true).
They went
down into the cave
system and began to dig.
The cave walls where
they were digging
suddenly collapsed and
they just narrowly
avoided being buried
alive in the debris.
They immediately packed
up and returned home. No
real harm was done
except that Ron and the
boys had to re-excavate
the entire area of the
collapse.
This and
other similar incidents
led Ron to seal the
passage. With the
honeycomb of tunnels, it
would be almost
impossible for anyone to
find the correct
passage, and this one
now looked - even up
close - as if it was a
natural stone wall.
Ron had
done all that he could
do using that
passageway, anyhow. It
would be impossible to
get any large object out
of the chamber through
that original passage.
All his
attempts to photograph
anything in the chamber
resulted in photos or
slides that looked like
a complete blur, so he
concluded that he simply
wasn't supposed to take
any photographs. (He
later understood why -
at that time, he was
much freer with sharing
his information and this
could have caused a lot
of serious problems if
some of the "unsavory
characters" he came in
contact with over the
years had SEEN evidence
that this solid gold
object REALLY existed.)
The next
order of business would
be to find the main
entrance into the
chamber - the passage
through which the items
were originally taken.
The Original Passage
Used
to Carry the Ark to the
Chamber
Before
permanently sealing the
passageway, Ron had gone
into the chamber with
the Ark and opened the
original entrance
(through which it was
carried) to see if he
could follow it to it's
point of origin. When he
opened it, he discovered
on the other side a very
large tunnel which
extended in both
directions. He observed
that the tunnel appeared
to be a natural tunnel
that had been enlarged
since he saw chisel
marks. But the bad news
was that it was
completely blocked with
large stones in both
directions. The problem
now to be solved was
determining the path
taken by those who put
the items in the
chamber.
To
resolve this question,
Ron began by using
simple reason. The items
had been in the temple -
that was their point of
origin. They were now in
this chamber, many feet
below ground level. A
great number of tunnels
have been found under
the temple mount and the
city, but none that he
knew of were heading in
this direction. Was the
entrance into the tunnel
within the city or was
it somewhere across the
street in front of the
northern wall? Ron had
an idea as to where to
begin his search.
"Zedekiah's Cave"
In the
winter of 1854, Dr.
Barclay, a physician and
missionary, went for a
walk in Jerusalem. He
was walking to the site
of the traditional
"Jeremiah's Grotto"
which is along the same
Calvary escarpment. As
he walked past the
Damascus Gate, suddenly
his dog, running ahead
of him, vanished. As he
searched for his dog who
didn't respond as he
usually did to his
owner's whistles, he
heard a muffled barking
coming from the
direction of the city
wall. When he approached
the wall, he noticed a
deep hole and when he
peered inside, he heard
his dog's familiar bark.
And this is how
"Zedekiah's Cave" was
discovered (or
rediscovered.)
This vast cavern is
located underneath the
Muslim section of the
city, extending 750 feet
into "Mt. Moriah",
beginning at the trench
or dry moat separating
the northern and
southern portion. It is
325 feet wide at the
maximum point and the
average height is almost
50 feet. It was clearly
a stone quarry, but at
what point it was in
use, we really do not
know. There are those
who believe it's stone
was used in the first
temple, and that may be
true. But it's existence
was not a well known
fact and most likely it
was always kept
completely sealed for
fear of any enemies
trying to tunnel into
the city. So little is
known for sure about the
giant quarry, but one
point everyone agreed on
was the fact that there
was no entrance into the
city from the quarry.
Viewing
the diagram (below) of
it's layout, the dark
areas are pillars of
solid rock left in place
to support the ceiling,
like the pillars left in
a coal mine. As the
miners work their way
back out of the mine
after depleting it of
all it's coal, they
remove these pillars of
coal and the mine
usually caves in. These
were obviously left in
place to prevent the
cavern from collapsing
since part of the
northern city is above
it. As Ron examined the
quarry carefully, he
noticed one thing that
bothered him.

When Ron
began a project, the
first thing he did was
determine the easiest
way to accomplish the
task that requires the
least work, and as he
walked the giant quarry,
something didn't make
sense. He tried to put
himself in the "shoes"
of the ancient
stonecutters as he
surveyed this massive
quarry.
Seeing
how deep into the side
of the mountain the
quarry extended, he
thought about how much
work it would have been
to bring all that stone
out of the quarry, carry
it through one of the
northern gates and into
the city. It would have
been easier to quarry it
out of the quarry across
the street than to haul
it out of that cavern.
To Ron,
the solution was obvious
- to cut a hole through
the ceiling of the
quarry and simply haul
the rocks up into the
city. The more he
thought it about, the
more obvious it became
to him - yet, no one had
ever found an entrance
into the quarry from the
city.
So Ron
began to examine the
rock pillars. And sure
enough, he found one
that wasn't a stone
pillar at all. It was a
giant mound of earth and
debris, piled up, he
believed, to the ceiling
and through the hole in
the ceiling. On the
surface it would look
like normal ground. But
unable to examine the
section above ground, he
didn't know if the rock
had been cut in a manner
that would allow the
cut-out section to fit
back over the hole like
a "man-hole cover" or if
it was only the piled up
earth that filled the
hole. But he was
convinced that the hole
is there.
A Tunnel
in the Quarry
With this
new information, Ron
wondered it there were
any tunnels leading from
the quarry. If so,
perhaps the Ark and
other items had been
lowered through the hole
from the area north of
the temple mount into
the cavern, and then
through a tunnel to it's
present location. So he
began to look for
tunnels. And sure
enough, he found one.
Almost
completely hidden from
view by boulders and
overhanging rock, there
was an opening into the
cave wall that was
sealed with several
large cut rocks and it
was heading in the right
direction. But it was a
long ways from the site
Ron had worked in all
those years. If this was
indeed the tunnel which
led to the chamber, Ron
would have quite a
project ahead of him in
clearing such a long
tunnel.
"The
Guardian Cherub"
In the late 1800s the
cavern was
systematically
researched and plotted
by Frenchman Charles
Clermont-Ganneau who
surveyed every nook and
cranny in the mammoth
quarry, making sketches,
drawing maps and
diagrams. During this
survey, he spotted a
flat etching in the
rock, which he carefully
sketched. It appeared to
be a creature with
wings, a lion's tail and
body, and a man's head
with a long, flowing
beard wearing a
strange-looking hat. The
etching was removed by
chiseling a slab of rock
around it and it was
taken to the Palestine
Exploration Offices in
London. The drawing made
by the Frenchman is
reproduced below.

The
similarity in basic
features between this
creature and a cherub
from the Israelite
palace in Samaria
(sketch below) can be
seen.

The style
of the etching
(according to
authorities that
specialize in that area
of expertise) indicated
that it was to be dated
to the approx. 7th
century BC when Israel
was under the cultural
influence of Assyria.
This would place it
before the Babylonian
captivity, which WAS the
correct time-frame
during which Ron
believed the items were
hidden.
And if we return to the
passage in 2 Maccabees,
which again we stress is
not to be considered
reliable, there IS a
remark about some of
Jeremiah's companions
during the time he
supposedly had the
objects hidden in the
cave:
"Some of
his companions came to
mark out the way, but
were unable to find it.
When Jeremiah learnt of
this he reprimanded
them."
Was this
etching done by these
"companions? It's an
interesting theory, but
- who really knows?
Ron still believed it
was significant. IF the
tunnel Ron had found WAS
the passage through
which the Ark and other
articles from the temple
were transported to the
chamber, just possibly
someone did etch this
cherub as symbolicy
"guarding" the tunnel
entrance. Remember Eden?
GEN 3:24
So he drove out the man;
and he placed at the
east of the garden of
Eden CHERUBIMS, and a
flaming sword every way,
to keep the way of the
tree of life.
The
etching WAS located near
the blocked entrance...
but, of course, again
this is just a theory.
Radar - A
Tunnel under the Road?
Ron used
the sub-surface
interface radar in later
years to check for the
existence of a tunnel
running from the
underground quarry to
the area of the
escarpment. He did find
a tunnel-like void
crossing under the
street in the correct
direction that was, as
best he could determine,
about 20 feet under the
road. But because it is
quite a distance to the
site he had excavated,
and because of the
buildings, etc. now
built in the area, he
couldn't follow the line
of the "void" to it's
final "destination".
He used
the radar on the blocked
up entrance in the
underground quarry and
found that there was a
void behind the blocks.

(The author in front of
the blocked-up tunnel)
All that was now left
was to open up the
entrance, which he did.
And there was a tunnel.
But several feet inside,
the passageway was again
blocked with big rocks
and dirt - to Ron, it
looked as if whoever had
blocked it had tried to
camouflage the fact that
it was a plugged tunnel
and make it look like
natural earth and rocks.
The next decision he had
to make was whether to
attempt to clear out the
extremely long tunnel or
keep working within the
original site and try to
find the main tunnel
from that end.
Continuing Work After
the Ark was Found
The time
came when Ron provided
something to the
authorities from the
excavation which DID
convince them that he
HAD at the least
discovered SOME items
from the first temple.
Then a plan was devised
by authorities to "test"
the water so to speak -
they wanted to carefully
determine the public
reaction should the
announcement be made
that the Ark of the
Covenant HAD been
discovered.
The
officials that Ron dealt
with were serious
government servants,
concerned with the
welfare of the people,
and they realized that
such an announcement
would most likely set
off a bloody clash
between those who would
want to immediately
destroy the mosque on
the temple mount to
rebuild the temple, and
the Arabs. While they
did not necessarily have
the religious belief
that any temple would
ever be rebuilt, they
were well acquainted
with the passion and
fanaticism of those who
did.
Their
efforts to test public
reaction to the
rebuilding of a new
temple resulted in much
bloodshed, and many
deaths. Until this day,
it is an extremely
critical issue and the
Israelis will, with
great care, handle the
situation the way they
handle everything else -
by a no-nonsense
approach with the best
interests of the
people's safety
foremost. What that
approach will be, we
don't know and perhaps
even they won't know
until the time arrives.
More Work
in the Cave System
Ron
decided to also continue
to search for the
original entrance into
the chamber from within
the cave system. With
better hi-tech
equipment, such as the
radar, he was able to
detect voids behind
solid rock walls which
was extremely useful.
From one particular
location within the cave
system, he KNEW he was
within a certain number
of feet of the chamber -
but getting from point A
to point B through many,
many feet of solid
limestone just wasn't
that easy.
He
followed many false
leads, such as a rock
wall they found within
the cave system which
followed along the
contour of the
cliff-face, just as the
wall of the chamber had
done. But this lead
didn't pan out.
I
couldn't understand the
problem when Ron tried
to explain everything to
me - that is until I
went into the cave
system myself. As I
entered the small hole,
I expected to find
myself in a large cave,
like the ones I had been
in as a child. Instead,
I discovered the small
hole went through a
jagged shaft about 25
feet STRAIGHT DOWN - I
had to hold onto a rope
and sort of "repel" off
the rocks. Exiting the
shaft, I found myself
standing on some wooden
planks which was the
only "floor" and it was
quite small - the open
cavern continued on
another 40 or more feet
beneath me.
It was
nothing like I had
expected. By the time I
had twisted and turned,
trying to conform my
body to the narrow shaft
which led into this
area, I discovered that
I had absolutely NO idea
of what direction I was
facing. Without a
compass, I was
completely disoriented.
Then, when I went
through a couple of the
small openings from the
main chamber, I was
absolutely amazed at how
tight the areas were.
Tending a bit towards
claustrophobia, I had a
brand new respect for
Ron, Danny and Ronny - I
couldn't imagine how
they did it, and I still
can't.
I had
earlier thought, "If you
know how many feet it is
to a certain point, why
don't you just measure
it and go there?" But
now, I understood why.
In the tight confines,
with cave walls and
rocks everywhere, it
seemed impossible to
measure anything. Or
even knowing the correct
direction seemed
impossible to me. Of
course, Ron had worked
in these caves and
tunnels for so many
years, he pretty much
knew it like the back of
his hand but this was
not going to be easy.
"Impending Doom"
In
addition to searching
within the cave system,
Ron took his team to the
blocked-up tunnel
entrance in the quarry
to open it. Removing the
blocks, there WAS the
void Ron had detected
with the radar as we
explained earlier, and
then the tunnel was
plugged. So, Ron crawled
inside and began to
remove the rocks and
debris, passing the
buckets down to the next
person, who passed it to
the next, etc., until
the last person who
dumped or disposed of
the contents. (This is
the same method they
used inside the cave
system - the "bucket
brigade" we call it,
sometimes consisting of
10 or more people.)
Once, while clearing the
tunnel with a group of
good friends from
Florida, he suddenly was
struck with a feeling of
impending "doom" or
"disaster". He told
everyone about this
"impression", and
explained that he didn't
know what was going to
happen but that they all
needed to quickly pack
up the equipment and
"get outta there". All
the guys did as he said,
and just as they started
walking out, everyone
heard a loud booming
thud coming from the
area of the tunnel. A
huge boulder in the
ceiling of the tunnel
had fallen right where
Ron had been sitting.
They
returned the next day
and Ron broke up the
huge boulder and removed
it - the feeling of
"doom" was gone and they
continued working. But
the debris plugging the
hole appeared to have no
end. They replaced the
blocks exactly as they
had found them and gave
up, at least for the
time being. For now, we
have no idea if the
tunnel is completely
blocked the entire way,
or even if it is the
correct tunnel.
However,
the last time Ron went
back into the tunnel,
Ronny was able to take
time off work and return
with him - and Ronny
found a Roman coin with
"Tiberius" on it, which
indicates that the
tunnel was opened in
Roman times but then
resealed. We could not
find this particular
coin in our list of
Imperial Roman coins and
therefore assume that
the coin was a "city
coin".
Digging
Straight Down
Ron's
last plan was to attempt
to dig a shaft through
the solid rock into the
chamber that held the
Ark and other objects.
But this was a very
precarious approach -
the shaft could cave in
and damage some of the
objects, or they could
expend all that effort
and discover they had
missed the chamber. It
would be a tremendous
undertaking, requiring
an awful lot of work.
But one trip, after his
main excavation team had
left for home, Ron and a
couple of faithful
assistants began the
shaft. They now had
jackhammer-drills and
much better equipment
than he and the boys had
used during the early
years.
They
began drilling the shaft
and got through about 10
feet of solid limestone
over several trips but
the end didn't seem
anywhere in sight. And
Ron experienced
something that is common
to the human species -
he became frustrated at
the tremendous effort
and expense that
appeared to be yielding
absolutely no results.

Of all
the projects Ron has
worked on, his sense of
unworthiness to work on
this one was and is
ever-present in his
thoughts. The Biblical
examples of those who
did a work for God but
at some time or another
failed in some manner
(such as the time Moses
struck the rock when he
was told to SPEAK to it,
which cost him the
privilege of being
allowed to enter the
promised land) are vivid
reminders to Ron of how
serious the consequences
could be if he should
allow any of his actions
or motivations to go
against God's will.
Sometimes, it was easy
for him to discern his
course of action, but
other times it wasn't.
Plus, he reasoned that
if the time came that he
had failed and God could
no longer use him, how
would he know? And by
this time, he was
beginning to wonder if
he was being "taken off
the job". He has always
known that God didn't
NEED him to get His work
done - he could always
find someone else. His
efforts didn't seem to
be paying off - it had
now been almost 10 years
since he first found the
Ark.
Words
of Encouragement from a
"Visitor"
"God Bless You in What
You Are Doing Here"
Several
years ago, Ron and one
assistant had gone to
Jerusalem to work on the
shaft. A month or 2
earlier Ron had spoken
at a church and one man
present took a
particular interest in
the Ark of the Covenant.
I well remember when he
called here and began to
question me about when
Ron was going over, etc.
He sounded like a nice
enough person and I told
him I didn't know for
sure (which I didn't)
but that it would be in
a few months. He then
asked me where they
stayed because, he
explained, he was going
to Israel and wanted a
relatively cheap hotel.
So, I told him where we
usually stayed - it
seemed like an innocent
enough question. But I
was soon to learn a
terrible lesson - that
we cannot tell anyone
when he is going
overseas to work,
whether it be Israel or
Egypt, or wherever.
When Ron and our friend
(who was helping him)
arrived at the hotel,
there was this man who
had called me. He
somehow had found out
Ron's arrival date (I
hadn't told him)! It
turned out that this man
was under the impression
(or delusion) that he
was a "prophet" and
intended to impose
himself into the
project. So here was Ron
and his digger, ready to
go to work - but there
was no way Ron was going
to let this man know
anything important, so
they went into the main
cave system but couldn't
do the work they
intended to do - not
with him present.
As Ron
explained it to me, this
episode was the straw
that sort of "broke the
camels back". He had
prayed, as he always
does, about going over
and had been convinced
it was what he was
supposed to do. Ron was
paying all the expenses
out of his own pocket
and this one was costly.
Adding it all up, it was
approximately $7,000.00
to $8,000.00 down the
tube, which is a LOT of
money to us. So, Ron
began to question if he
was really doing what
God wanted him to do, or
if he was just fooling
himself. At this time,
it had been almost 10
years since he had first
found the Ark - had he
done something wrong
that God could no longer
use him? Whatever was
the case, Ron decided on
that trip that he was
through - finished. He
would close up the cave
system and never return.
And let
me tell you, this is NOT
like Ron at all. He was
very excited when he
left here, and the
experience with the
"prophet" showing up
must have been a
terrible blow. What
little he has told me
about the incident
indicates that it was a
far worse experience
than it sounds. But
whatever happened, it
completely deflated Ron,
who interpreted the
failed trip to mean that
he had been "taken off
the job".
But then
Ron had an experience
that changed his life.
One day on that trip, he
and the "prophet" were
sitting on the ground
just outside the
entrance into the cave
system - Ron's helper
was inside. Ron was
working on the radar
scanner - changing the
paper or something - and
the "prophet" was in the
shade of a large bush
eating his lunch. Where
they were sitting was,
at that time, many feet
lower than the ground
level just behind them
because this was where
Ron had excavated down
years earlier. It's
necessary to understand
this in light of the
next event.
Ron heard
a voice behind him say
"God bless you in what
you are doing here", and
he looked up. Standing
on the much higher
ground many feet above
him was a tall, slender
man with dark hair
wearing a long white
robe and head covering
similar to that worn in
Biblical times - except
that it was all pure
white. Startled, mainly
because he didn't TELL
anyone what he was
"doing here", he
wondered who this man
was.
He tried
to make polite
conversation and asked
him if he was from
around the area. The man
replied simply "No" then
remained silent. Ron
then asked him if he was
a tourist, and he again
replied simply, "No".
More silence, then the
figure in white said,
"I'm on my way from
South Africa to the New
Jerusalem". Ron was so
startled that he
couldn't say anything,
but just stared at him.
Then, the man again
said, "God bless you in
what you are doing
here", and then turned
and walked away.
After a
moment, the "prophet",
who couldn't see the man
because he was beneath
the shade of the bush,
said, "Ron, do you think
we've been talking to an
angel?" Ron replied, "At
least..."
I
remember his call like
it was yesterday. If you
don't know Ron
personally, let me
explain that Ron is very
low-keyed. He never acts
excited or angry - his
voice rarely gives away
his true feelings. But I
knew something had
happened even though his
voice was calm. He told
me what had happened,
and explained how just
hours earlier, he had
silently given up -
frustrated, tired and
simply worn down, he had
lost his belief that
what he was doing was
God's will. Then, this
stranger appeared and he
repeated word for word
their conversation. He
was glad that the
"prophet" had at least
heard the conversation -
at least he knew for
sure that it really
happened.
And when
he questioned the locals
who worked along the
only path anyone could
take to enter the area,
he discovered that NO
one had seen anyone of
that description either
come into the area or
leave. Although the
escarpment is extremely
long, today it is
surrounded by buildings,
fences and stone walls
which prevent anyone
coming into the area
except through one
particular street. And
the vendors along that
street have been there
day after day as long as
Ron had worked there and
he knew them well. There
was no doubt about it -
the stranger in white
had been seen by no one
else. And then Ron told
me that he believed it
was more than just an
angel - he was deeply
impressed that it may
have been Christ,
Himself.
Whether
Christ or an angel, the
experience was enough to
encourage Ron and
convince him that his
efforts had NOT been in
vain, and that he WAS
still in God's will.
And since
then, I have seen the
results of that
experience over and
over, in both of us.
From that moment
forward, nothing could
or will ever dampened
Ron's zeal or belief in
that or any other
project. When he and his
group were kidnapped
about a year later
(August 1991) in eastern
Turkey, I know the
knowledge of that
experience gave me
complete peace - I never
once (after the initial
shock) believed Ron was
in serious danger
because I knew he still
had work to do. My calm
was so noticeable that
when Ron returned, his
friends at the hospital
ribbed him, saying "Your
wife sure must not care
too much for you because
she was AWFULLY calm on
TV when talking about
her kidnapped husband."
Ron
doesn't talk about this
experience with "the man
in white" a great deal,
but I believe it
literally changed his
life, giving him enough
encouragement to endure
whatever it takes to get
the work finished. And
since that time until
his death, Ron, like
everyone else, had been
"waiting".
The Blood
Tests
No
one was any more
surprised when Ron first
publicly told about the
results of the blood
tests on the specimens
he had taken from the
broken top of the stone
case, just above the
Mercy Seat than I was.
(All that he has stated
about this can be seen
in his talk on our
"Presentation" video and
will not be repeated
here.)
He had
taken other specimens
from along the crack
where it extends through
the bedrock adjacent to
the cross-hole and I
myself had been able to
take a small sample,
rehydrate it over a 3
day period, and view the
red blood cells through
the microscope. But even
then, he never mentioned
to me any actual lab
analyses being done. Nor
have I ever seen the
other specimen.
Therefore, all I can
report here is what he
has already said, as he
has told me that when
the time is right, he
planned to have 2
unbiased geneticists go
into the chamber, take
their own samples, and
each do his own
independent analysis
which will be filmed in
progress.
Again,
this was Ron's plan -
what HE hoped would
occur - but as with
everything else, we do
not know for sure
exactly how, when or
where everything will
ultimately occur. But
for now, I have nothing
more to say on the
subject. Ron learned
from his experiences
with Noah's Ark that
even when he had the lab
analyses filmed as they
were done, there were
those who came up with
incredible reasons for
discounting the results,
such as saying that Ron
"made" the specimen,
etc.
All one
had to do is watch a bit
of the O. J. Simpson
trial to see how
important blood tests
can be, and how people
can find a way to
try to discredit them.
My personal opinion is
this: IF the Lord
intends that His Son's
Blood be shown publicly
to have such unique
characteristics that His
humanity and divinity
cannot be denied, He
will arrange for this
evidence to be presented
in a manner that
"clever" men cannot
"explain it away" from
honest people. Since the
time Ron found the
Blood, genetic (DNA)
research has come a long
way, perhaps indicating
that God is preparing
mankind for the proof
that will not remain
silent, but will shake
the world. So, for now,
just consider what
little Ron has told, and
again, watch and wait.
Ron is no longer here,
so it is entirely in the
Lord's Hands.
I have
one last comment on this
subject - people who
claim to be "believers"
make statements like,
"That can't be true - it
would be impossible to
be a human and have the
peculiar traits
displayed in this
blood". We need to
remember that HE made
us; we have NO right to
limit His power by our
severely limited
knowledge of His
creation.
Some
people refuse to believe
He could have parted the
Red Sea in deep water,
at a spot that is 8
miles across. Then,
these same people try to
explain in terms that WE
can understand, that He
really parted it in 30
feet of water when the
wind was just right,
etc., etc. What they are
forgetting is that HE
created not only this
planet, but EVERYTHING
that is throughout the
known and unknown
universe. It is no great
thing for Him to part a
little water.
So, hold
your judgment on matters
that are not yet proven.
This doesn't mean to
blindly accept the word
of anyone. It only means
to wait and see.
The "Dark
Side"
Ron recalled to me the 5
people who had lost
their lives at the very
time they were
attempting to interfere
with or even halt the
excavation. (There have
been at least 6 more
deaths since I first
wrote this.) We will not
make these public
because of their
families. But we still
have the newspaper
article - the front page
of the Nashville Banner
- telling about the
death of one.
This man
had stumbled upon Ron
and the boys as they
were coming and going
from the excavation and
began to ask questions.
He soon found out what
was going on (at this
time, Ron had already
seen the Ark) and was
determined that "the
world" needed to know.
He called a "press
conference" in which he
was going to announce "a
great discovery". When
Ron learned of this, he
and the boys immediately
changed their flight and
left the night before it
was scheduled.
The press
conference was to take
place in a nearby
alley-way that was
relatively secluded.
When Ron arrived back
home, he found the
account on the front
page of the Nashville
newspaper. The man had
been found dead in that
alley-way, shot in the
head by a single
"sniper's" bullet when
the journalists arrived.
No further explanation
was given.
I could
easily write volumes on
the experiences Ron has
had with those who have
tried to interfere with
the work, as well as
those who have taken it
upon themselves to try
to discredit him and his
work with lies and
personal opinions. I
know of 2 people who
worked with Ron on one
discovery (not this one)
who both expressed to me
that - bottom line -
they "turned on him"
because they simply
cannot believe that he
found the Ark of the
Covenant.
Well,
the way I look at that
is - Thomas wouldn't
believe Christ was
really standing before
him until he saw the
imprint of the nails in
His hands and the wound
in His side - and Christ
DIDN'T chastise him for
this. In fact, this very
episode may have
happened for the benefit
of those who would come
later and COULDN'T see
Him, but would read of
Thomas's need of
"proof".
It is no
"sin" to require
evidence. "Faith" is not
blind - it is based on
reality which is all
around us. But what was
sufficient in the past
is no longer sufficient
to the "man" of today
who is bombarded by
so-called "scientific"
evidences which the
"experts" interpret to
us as "positive
evidence" that the Bible
is a "myth". God, in His
mercy, is providing
hard-core evidence for a
generation that has been
taught to believe "as
gospel" the "word" of
our educators and men of
"higher learning". No
one should accept
anyone's word on
anything until they can
see evidence. However,
when someone has backed
up other claims with
solid evidence, that is
sufficient reason to
consider something they
may claim but be unable
to prove at the time.
Again, I cannot stress
enough the importance of
educating yourself on
the subject and
withholding final
judgment until solid
evidence is shown "yea"
or "nay".
Will the
Ark be made Public?
Everything is still
where Ron found it,
completely hidden and
very well guarded. Will
EVERYTHING be shown
publicly? I don't know -
I know that Ron's
greatest desire was to
excavate the entire
area, exposing the site
of the crucifixion down
to the chamber, but now
that he is gone, I doubt
that will ever happen.
I have learned that no
matter how I believe
events will occur, they
ALWAYS happen
differently. "But
surely the Ark will be
brought out, won't it?",
people ask. I don't know
if it ever will - it is
deep in the earth and
getting it and the other
objects out at this time
seems almost impossible
without some Divine
assistance. Ron had
concluded several years
ago that it would
probably remain right
where it is, with only
the Tables of Stone
being brought out.
But I don't know.
Ron was
of the belief that the
things you have read
about here will be made
public soon, due to
other events which we
have cause to believe
are about to occur
(which we won't mention
now), but remember, he
had been waiting since
1982. If it doesn't
happen that soon,
remember that he didn't
say that it WILL be that
soon - only that he
believed there was a
strong likelihood.
I have
often thought that
perhaps the Lord
intended for His workers
to believe the time was
soon - in fact, sooner
than it really was, - in
order for them to have
the "drive" to get the
work done. We humans
tend to put off doing
things if we think we
have time.
I DO ask
that you pray for this
site because at this
moment there are certain
people, led by Satan,
who are attempting to
"bury it" even deeper in
the earth than it
already is. After all,
what could Satan fear
more than the evidence
which lies buried
there?!
However
things happen will be in
God's perfect time and
no one will be able to
change the events which
He intends to occur. But
perhaps we can hasten
His coming by being
faithful and diligent
servants, finishing the
work He has given us to
do.
I DO believe the world
will get to SEE the Ark
and other objects, and
that the Tables of
Stone WILL be brought
out. And I DO
believe the time is
getting near. To
understand why, keep
reading.
Other Claims about
the Ark of the Covenant
A Copy of
the Ark?
Every now
and then someone asks us
about the story of the
Ark being carried off to
Ethiopia by the Queen of
Sheba's son after he had
a copy made to replace
the original.
There are several things
to consider here -
first, in order for a
copy to be made,
someone had to view
it. But no one except
the high priest could
access it and even then,
he only stood before it
once a year. If anyone
else so much as looked
at it, or touched the
covering over it, they
were struck dead. Who
could have seen it to
copy it?
But more
than that, dare we
presume that God could
be fooled? His Presence
dwelled constantly above
that Mercy Seat - did He
just "move over"
complacently to a fake
Ark? His requirements
for the protection of
the Most Holy place from
being defiled were so
precise, - He even gave
very, very strict
requirements as to the
high priest's garments
when he came into His
Presence. God would not
allow man to defile His
earthly Throne.
Then
there are other stories,
such as it having been
taken to Elephantine
Island. The problem with
these outlandish
theories is that the
people promoting them
have no concept of what
the Ark really is, or
God's purpose and
protection of it.
We must
be very careful lest we
forget His Holiness. Our
God is all powerful,
almighty and Holy. No
man could fool God with
a "copy" of His earthly
Throne. Nor would He
allow unsacred hands to
carry His Throne away.
It just didn't happen.
Amazingly, this is the
same type of story that
has been concocted about
Noah's Ark - the story
that the true remains
are a copy made by
Constantine or someone
like that. When Satan is
confronted with God's
evidence and he cannot
destroy this evidence,
he has to resort to lies
to try to lessen its
impact.
These are
Satan's counterfeits.
The stories constantly
change. They bear no
witness to our Redeemer.
The Ark
and a Third Temple?
The Ark
and the Jews -
Sacrifices, Again?
A
question we are
sometimes asked is if we
believe the Jews are to
re-institute the
sacrificial system when
the Ark is revealed. If
we believe the Word of
God, the answer can only
be "no". As we discussed
earlier, Jeremiah, who
prophesied during the
time of the Ark's
disappearance, wrote:
JER 3:16 And it shall
come to pass, when ye be
multiplied and increased
in the land, in those
days, saith the LORD,
they shall say no more,
The ark of the covenant
of the LORD: neither
shall it come to mind:
neither shall they
remember it; neither
shall they visit it;
neither shall that be
done any more.
The Lord had told the
Jews that if they
returned to Him, He
would do marvelous
things for them. But
promise, being
conditional on their
obedience to Him, never
came to pass.
However, the verse we
have just read above, in
Jeremiah, was to tell
them that the day would
come when the Messiah
would die for them,
all sacrifices would
cease. This was not a
conditional prophecy. It
was a fact that would
come to pass. They were
to be His lightbearers
to the world but their
failure resulted in this
great honor being taken
from them. The fact that
they, as a people,
rejected God's pleas and
their final apostasy did
not change the fact that
the day would come when
sacrifices to Him would
be an abomination:
ISA 66:3 He that killeth
an ox is as if he slew a
man; he that sacrificeth
a lamb, as if he cut off
a dog's neck; he that
offereth an oblation, as
if he offered swine's
blood; he that burneth
incense, as if he
blessed an idol. Yea,
they have chosen their
own ways, and their soul
delighteth in their
abominations.
The verse in Jeremiah
indicates that God will
never return the
Ark to the Jews for this
purpose. But aside from
this, when the Jews went
into captivity in
Babylon and the temple
was destroyed, God spoke
through His prophet
Ezekiel in giving them
new instructions
regarding the
sacrificial system -
instructions which no
longer included the Ark
of the Covenant. See
Ezekiel 44 through 46.
When they
returned from captivity,
they continued the
sacrificial system as
God has instructed, but
without the Ark. During
the time of Christ, they
were still performing
the sacrificial system,
again - without the Ark.
There is no reason why
they needed the Ark to
perform the sacrificial
system. All they would
have to do is build a
"table of the Lord" as
instructed in Ezekiel
41:22.
Let us
never forget that Satan
was once a "covering
cherub" - he lived in
the very Presence of
God. And he knows the
truth - he knows what's
going on, and his aim is
to obliterate God's
Truth. He inspires men
to come up with ideas
and theories which do
away with sacred truths,
that we may be deceived.
And for even the true
believers, our only
safeguard is in His Holy
Word.
I am of
the belief, as was Ron,
that many people have
applied prophecies which
refer to "Israel", to
the literal Jewish race,
when they in fact refer
to the "people of God"
(which, of course,
consists of people of
all races, including
Jews):
GAL 3:29
And if ye be Christ's,
then are ye Abraham's
seed, and heirs
according to the
promise.
As a result, many
prophecies which refer
to events which occur
after the Second Advent
of Christ, are
misunderstood to be
events which occur after
His First Advent
(and thusly before
He returns.)
Christ's
Blood on the Mercy Seat
On
January 6, 1982, Ron
Wyatt entered a chamber
underneath the Calvary
escarpment, north of the
city wall of Jerusalem.
In this chamber he saw
the Ark of the Covenant
and numerous other
things which he believes
are the rest of the
furnishings constructed
at Sinai by God's
explicit directions for
the earthly sanctuary.
Upon the Mercy Seat, he
found what looked to him
to be dried blood.
Today, we know that this
is blood and that it is
human. We believe It is
the very Blood Christ
shed for our sins. This
concept was entirely new
to Ron, and we have
never found any
reference in any ancient
records which speak of
such a concept. But as
we have studied, we
realized - to our
understanding - this was
the only way it could
have happened and
fulfill the type
perfectly.
God, in His dealings
with His creation of
man, teaches us His
great truths in the only
manner in which we can
understand them -
through types, similes,
examples and parables.
Christ, when He preached
to the people, spake
only in parables:
MAT 13:34 All these
things spake Jesus
unto the multitude in
parables; and without a
parable spake he not
unto them:
In our
previous articles, we
have briefly studied the
sacrificial system,
sometimes called the
sanctuary service, and
we understand that it is
the "type" for the true
work of the True
Sacrificial Lamb and
High Priest.
The design of the plan
of salvation features
Christ as the Perfect
Sacrifice on earth.
At His death, He was
both the "sin offering"
(sacrifice) and the
"sin-bearer" (High
Priest, who bears the
sins from the sanctuary
and places them on the
head of the scape-goat
that represents Satan
when the sanctuary is
finally cleansed)
His
ministrations in the
Heavenly Holy and Most
Holy Places, which are
His official offices of
Mediator and High
Priest, He resumed after
His death and ascension
into Heaven.
But in
between His death as the
Sacrifice for sin, and
His assumption of His
Priestly role in Heaven,
lies the antitype on
which it all hinged -
the presenting of His
Blood to His Father.
The Precision with which
the
"Antitypes" Fulfilled
the "Types"
Many
people believe that His
Blood, to perfectly
fulfill the type, had to
be presented by Him IN
PERSON to His Father in
Heaven. But that wasn't
possible - Christ died
on earth, not in Heaven.
His sacrifice had to be
accepted before He would
be resurrected and he
was in the grave when
His Sacrifice was
accepted.
Others
believe that His Blood
had only to fall upon
the ground to be
considered "offered" to
the Father. But, we have
to look carefully for
the "type" to this
"antitype.
God gave extremely
explicit directions as
to the offering of the
blood by the priests and
high priest. The least
little deviation from
His instructions - if
the sacrifice was not
perfect, for example -
and the priest was
struck dead. Remember
what happened to Aaron's
sons, Nadab and Abihu
when they offered
"strange" fire before
the Lord at Sinai
NUM 3:4 And Nadab and
Abihu died before the
LORD, when they offered
strange fire before the
LORD,...
God
required His Holy Things
to be kept undefiled. He
would not accept an
offering that was not
perfect and did not meet
all the requirements in
its presentation. Ron
did not, nor do I,
believe the Father would
allow His Son's Blood to
be offered simply upon
the ground, for the
earth is defiled. It
belongs, for the time
being, to the prince of
this planet, Satan.
Instead, it fell upon
the ground, through the
rock and upon the Mercy
Seat of the Ark of the
Covenant - God's earthly
throne.
Since
every other type was met
in antitype so
precisely, this
presenting of Christ's
Blood to His Father
would also have been
perfectly fulfilled. His
sacrifice had to be
accepted by His Father
before He would be
resurrected. The
evidence that it was
accepted by His Father
can also be seen in
those who were
resurrected at the same
time as Christ:
MAT 27:50 Jesus, when he
had cried again with a
loud voice, yielded up
the ghost. 51 And,
behold, the veil of the
temple was rent in twain
from the top to the
bottom; and the earth
did quake, and the rocks
rent; 52 And the graves
were opened; and many
bodies of the saints
which slept arose, 53
And came out of the
graves after his
resurrection,
and went into the holy
city, and appeared unto
many.
Between
the time Christ died on
the cross and the time
He arose, His Blood was
presented to His Father
and it was accepted by
Him. Yet no human hands
physically presented His
Blood. From the
beginning, the plan was
perfect.
600 years
before Christ would die,
God arranged to have His
earthly Throne, the Ark
with its Mercy Seat,
hidden deep within the
earth just below where
His Son would die on the
cross. And upon this
Mercy Seat, Christ's
Blood would fall,
acknowledging the claims
of God's eternal Law.
In the
earthly service, the
high priest offered the
blood, but Christ, the
True High Priest, was
dead. His Father had
arranged that even in
His death, Christ would
sprinkle the required
Blood upon the Mercy
Seat.
When
Christ died, the earth
quaked. The rock was
split right below His
cross and this crevice
extended right down into
the hidden chamber which
contained the undefiled
"earthly" Throne of God
- the Ark with its Mercy
Seat. After He was dead,
when the centurion stuck
his spear into Christ's
side and pierced His
spleen, the Blood and
water came out, falling
down through that crack
and was sprinkled on the
Mercy Seat.

Christ
was taken down from the
cross and placed in
Joseph's tomb. He was
dead. He rested in His
grave over the Sabbath.

Then, early the next
morning, the same unseen
Hand that caused the
first earthquake, caused
another earthquake at
the moment the Sacrifice
was accepted by the
Father. The Son was
commanded to life and
came out of His grave, a
victor over death for
eternity.
And to prove this
victory, many saints
also came out of their
graves at the same time,
never to taste death
again. Although Christ
gave His life,
the decision as to
whether the Sacrifice
was acceptable belonged
to His Father.
The Ark -
Undefiled by Man or
Satan
God
made wonderful
provisions for this Ark.
No man could defile it -
only the high priest
could come nigh unto it,
and even then, if he did
not comply with God's
requirements, he too
would be struck dead.
It
remained the only place
on earth that could
receive Christ's Blood
as the sin offering, for
it was the only object
on this planet that had
not been defiled by man.
God would not allow man
to defile His earthly
Throne, nor did He allow
man to destroy the
Tables of the Law
beneath that Throne. The
payment of every sin was
made just above that
eternal Law.
PSA 89:14
Justice and judgment are
the habitation of thy
throne: mercy and truth
shall go before thy
face.
Perfect
"justice" demands the
death of the sinner. But
perfect "mercy" provided
a substitute for the
truly repentant sinner.
PSA 85:10 Mercy and
truth are met together;
righteousness and peace
have kissed each other.
11 Truth shall spring
out of the earth; and
righteousness shall look
down from heaven.
The mercy
of God the Father, which
could never have been
seen without the
existence of sin, is
finally manifested for
all mankind when He
allowed His only
begotten Son to die. The
"truth" of His Law was
covered with the Blood
of His Son - and
provided salvation for
all mankind from the
condemnation of that Law
through the
righteousness of
Christ.
Christ's
Blood Didn't Shatter the
Tables of Stone
What does
the discovery of the Ark
of the Covenant mean
today? What is the
connection with what we
have just discussed?
The Ark was built to
hold the precious Law
and above the Law was
the Mercy Seat where
God's Presence was
manifested. The Perfect
Law required perfect
obedience - anything
less demanded the death
of the sinner.
God's Presence and His
Law are inseparable. No
man can come nigh unto
Him and live - except
through Christ, Who shed
His Blood on that very
Mercy Seat, between
God's perfect Law and
God Himself. Christ's
Blood didn't shatter
those Tables of Stone -
His eternal Law does now
and will eternally
remain in effect.
Christ's Blood above
that Law shattered the
chains which bound us to
sin and death:
PSA 85:10 Mercy and
truth are met together;
righteousness and peace
have kissed each other.
11 Truth shall spring
out of the earth; and
righteousness shall look
down from heaven.
"Mercy
and truth" met together
on that Mercy Seat.
"From the earth" shall
spring "Truth" when the
Ark and the Tables of
Stone can be revealed to
all the earth. And as we
sit here today, our
"Righteousness" is
looking down from
Heaven, as our great
High Priest pleads His
Blood on our behalf
before His Father.
When the
entire world can see
that very Ark that God
manifested His Own
Presence upon, then they
will see for themselves
that His Law is real. It
wasn't nailed to the
cross - only the Law
contained in ordinances
which pertained to the
sacrificial system was
done away with. If God
could have done away
with His Law, He most
certainly would not have
allowed His Son to have
suffered and died as He
did.
His
eternal Law will abide
forever.
Apostate Christianity
and the Tables of Stone
I
believe we are very near
the time of Christ's
return, as did Ron. But
it appears that the
majority of those who
call themselves by His
Name have been blinded
to the great truths
which will separate the
sheep from the goats. If
we go back to Genesis
and the story of Cain
and Abel, we learn from
the beginning that God
accepts NO substitute or
variation in what He has
commanded of us. Cain
was enraged that his
offering of produce from
his fields was not
acceptable - but God had
specifically dictated
the requirements of the
sacrifices which were to
be offered - blood
sacrifices - because
they were all
representative of the
death of His Son. In his
rage, Cain slew his own
brother, Abel, whose
offering WAS accepted.
As we
read through the Bible,
we read over and over
how God's people never
ceased from
incorporating other
practices in with the
worship of God -
practices which were NOT
acceptable in any way,
form or manner, EVEN
though they may have
appeared harmless to the
people. God was and
still is always VERY
precise and clear in His
requirements of His
people - they never
changed over the years,
even though many will
very quickly tell you
that they have.
UNITY!
Today,
the people who call
themselves by His Name
are about to face the
greatest crisis they
have ever had to face.
This may seem hard to
believe in this age when
we no longer must
worship in hiding and
fear of persecution, but
it is a fact. For it is
now that the plan has
been set into action for
all churches to unite on
common points of
doctrine. All the
suffering and
persecution of God's
people who fought to
maintain the purity of
God's doctrine through
the ages is about to
come to nought.
Day after
day the TV features
various and sundry
"leaders" speaking of
how this "unity" will
accomplish God's work,
when in fact, it will
indeed finish a "work",
but it won't be God's.
Pagan practices and
doctrines that swiftly
crept into the Christian
faith soon after
Christ's time still
dominate "Apostate
Christianity" even
though some of the
purity of the faith was
restored to some degree
in some churches over
the last few centuries.
It was in
this country, the United
States of America, that
the true purity of the
faith was given the
chance to grow and
thrive. It was this
country that would be
uppermost in sending
missionaries to the
world to complete the
spreading of the gospel.
But now, just as the
work is about to be
finished, the churches
that once fought so hard
to remain free of the
influence of "Apostate
Christianity" are about
to join with it.
The reasoning of those
who are fighting for
this unity is that there
is "strength" in
numbers. Are not we
all "God's children?"
Can we not strengthen
our position in the
world by unifying?
Let's think a moment
about these questions.
Do we honestly believe
that just because
someone claims to be a
"true believer" that
they ARE when they teach
and believe doctrines
that are contrary to the
Word of God? Read
carefully the warnings:
MAT 7:15
Beware of false
prophets, which come to
you in sheep's clothing,
but inwardly they are
ravening wolves. 16 Ye
shall know them by their
fruits. Do men gather
grapes of thorns, or
figs of thistles?... 21
Not every one that saith
unto me, Lord, Lord,
shall enter into the
kingdom of heaven; but
he that doeth the will
of my Father which is in
heaven. 22 Many will say
to me in that day, Lord,
Lord, have we not
prophesied in thy name?
and in thy name have
cast out devils? and in
thy name done many
wonderful works? 23 And
then will I profess unto
them, I never knew you:
depart from me, ye that
work iniquity.
1JO 4:1
Beloved, believe not
every spirit, but try
the spirits whether they
are of God: because many
false prophets are gone
out into the world.
We should
all be aware that God
does NOT force Himself
on any man. But Satan,
on the other hand, will
stop at nothing to
accomplish his purposes.
What will happen when
all of "Christianity" is
unified? Will the "good"
rub off on the "bad"? OR
are we in danger of
being deceived by these
"false" teachers, and
what happens if we are?
ISA 9:16 For THE LEADERS
OF THIS PEOPLE CAUSE
THEM TO ERR; and THEY
THAT ARE LED OF THEM ARE
DESTROYED.
JER 5:30
A wonderful and horrible
thing is committed in
the land; 31 The
prophets prophesy
falsely, and the priests
bear rule by their
means; and my people
love to have it so: and
what will ye do in the
end thereof?
Being led
astray by false teachers
is NOT excusable by God,
for He has continually
warned us. Paul knew it
would come:
ACT 20:29 For I know
this, that after my
departing shall grievous
wolves enter in among
you, not sparing the
flock. 30 Also of
your own selves shall
men arise, speaking
perverse things, to draw
away disciples after
them.
The
greatest danger we face
is NOT from the
unbelievers of this
world, but those who
claim to be believers
and teach false
doctrine:
ROM 16:17 Now I beseech
you, brethren, mark
them which cause
divisions and offences
contrary to the doctrine
which ye have learned;
and AVOID THEM.18 For
they that are such serve
not our Lord Jesus
Christ, but their
own belly; and by good
words and fair speeches
deceive the hearts of
the simple.
ISA 8:20 To the law
and to the testimony: if
they speak NOT according
to this word, it is
because there is NO
light in them.
But is it really
so dangerous for all the
churches to work
together? My friend,
there is NO greater
danger. It is easy to
recognize those who make
no claim to believe; but
there is one who knows
the Bible far better
than any human alive,
and it is those who are
led of him (Satan) that
can appear to be the
most "godly" ON THE
SURFACE while
introducing their lies
cleverly intermingled
with the Word of God:
2CO
11:14 And no marvel; for
Satan himself is
transformed into an
angel of light.15
Therefore it is no great
thing if his ministers
also be transformed as
the ministers of
righteousness; whose
end shall be according
to their works.
COL 2:4 And this I say,
lest any man should
beguile you with
enticing words... 6 As
ye have therefore
received Christ Jesus
the Lord, so walk ye in
him:... 8 Beware lest
any man spoil you
through philosophy and
vain deceit, after the
tradition of men, after
the rudiments of the
world, and not after
Christ.
MAT 15:9 But in vain
they do worship me,
teaching for doctrines
the commandments of men
To
follow any "man" -
teacher, preacher,
father, mother, etc. -
is wrong. We follow only
one, our Lord and
Savior, Jesus Christ. We
do NOT unite with those
we know to have corrupt
beliefs, even though we
may share some common
beliefs.
PSA 4:3
But know that the LORD
hath set apart him that
is godly for himself:
the LORD will hear when
I call unto him.
Before He
died, Christ carefully
explained the transition
from the "old covenant"
to the "new covenant" -
any and all changes were
explained and foretold
by Him. He delivered the
doctrine to man Himself,
and then the time came
when He ascended to
Heaven, to the right
side of His Father. From
that moment on, there
would be NO changes made
in the faith that He had
personally delivered.
Yet,
very, VERY soon there
began to creep into the
body of believers
heresies and false
teachings. The attempt
to popularize
Christianity led to the
transference of pagan
traditions to the
practices of the church.
This continued until the
true faith was almost
unrecognizable. Those of
the true faith were once
again forced to hide;
they suffered the
greatest persecution NOT
at the hands of pagans
but at the hands of
those who had perverted
the faith.
Eternal
Life - A Free Gift
Many are
of the belief that since
the gift of eternal life
is free, that we have to
do nothing to obtain it
but ask. It would not be
a "covenant" if this
were the case - a
"covenant" is an
agreement between 2
parties with
stipulations which both
sides must meet.
Eternal life is a free
gift because we can do
absolutely nothing to
earn it. But we must
cooperate with God in
our own salvation, and
this requires that we
study His Word and KNOW
what is His truth and
what is the "doctrine
of men". We CANNOT
compromise after the
great sacrifice that has
been made on our behalf.
Not
UNITY, but COMPROMISE!
The plan
has been set into action
to undo the work of
those who fought so
fiercely for the
preservation and
restoration of the true
faith. The plan is what
some have referred to as
a "one world religion",
but it is actually a
plan for all the
"churches" to unite
under "common points of
doctrine", for the
purpose of "spreading
the Gospel of Jesus
Christ".
But this "unity", which
WILL in some form come
to pass, will ultimately
NOT revolve around
"common points of
doctrine", but instead
it will involve
COMPROMISE.
To the
masses of believers who
have remained in
ignorance of the true
Biblical teachings and
taught instead the
theories of men, they
will think this new
found unity of the
"church" is of God. They
will see it as the
answer to the spiritual
"death" that has come
upon the world. But like
a serpent slowly
slithering in the grass,
undetectable to the eye,
the true character of
this "unified church"
will begin to unfold.
I will
tell you exactly what
Ron believed, and what I
believe, is going to
happen. The little
compromises made by all
of the churches in the
beginning will soon be
met with bigger and more
radical ones. But the
ball will already be
rolling and none will be
able to back out. Then
suddenly, the "serpent"
strikes - liberty of
conscience will be no
more. Religious laws
will be issued which,
although seemingly "good
and moral", will NOT be
exactly as God Spoke
them from Mt. Sinai, and
then wrote with His Own
Finger.
The "Mark
of the Beast"
Those who accept this
"unified apostate
church's" version of
God's law and comply
with it receive the
"mark of the beast" "in
their forehead" - which
is symbolic of their
rejection of God's Law.
Those who willingly
comply with it although
recognizing that it is
opposed to God's Law,
receive this "mark" "in
their hand", which
symbolizes their
"knowing" disobedience
to God's Law in order to
avoid persecution.
But those who comply
with God's Law
and reject this altered
"version" do NOT receive
this "mark", which
simply means they are
considered by civil
authorities to be
lawbreakers. This has
happened in the past to
those who refused to
compromise their faith
and it WILL happen
again.
They
cannot buy or sell. The
reason they cannot buy
or sell is because
everything they own is
confiscated. Without
money, you cannot buy.
When you own nothing,
you have nothing to
sell. God's people are
those who "cannot buy
nor sell". But the rest
of the world looks at
this group as they
looked at Christ and
jeered, "If you're the
Son of God, SAVE
yourself! Come down off
of that cross!"
This is
an event of world-wide
extent which will
encompass the countries
of the globe before it
is over. Right now, the
governments of the world
are in league to
regulate peace efforts,
and environmental and
trading practices. It
will be very easy to
slip into these
regulations laws which
are contrary to God's
Eternal Law.
And it is
now that the last call
is going out:
REV 18:2 ...Babylon the
great is fallen, is
fallen, and is become
the habitation of
devils, and the hold of
every foul spirit, and a
cage of every unclean
and hateful bird. 3 For
all nations have drunk
of the wine of the wrath
of her fornication, and
the kings of the earth
have committed
fornication with her,
and the merchants of the
earth are waxed rich
through the abundance of
her delicacies.4....
come out of her, my
people, that ye be not
partakers of her sins,
and that ye receive not
of her plagues.
Don't people realize
that this "last call" to
come out of Babylon is
given to GOD"S PEOPLE? -
"Come out of her, my
people,..."
Just take a moment and
think about that - where
are God's people? When
you recognize where they
are, then you will
understand the call to
"come out of her".
The
Tables of Stone with the
10 Commandments
We
believe that when the
time comes that these
universal laws are being
debated around the world
and about to become the
"law of the land", the
Tables of Stone written
by God's Own Finger will
come out and be a
witness to the true Law
that He spoke from His
Own lips at Mt. Sinai:
PSA 89:34
My covenant will I not
break, NOR ALTER THE
THING THAT IS GONE OUT
OF MY LIPS.
Christ
didn't suffer and die so
that the Law could be
done away with - if that
were the case, there
would be no such thing
as "sin"
ROM 3:20
... for by the law is
the knowledge of sin.
Some
people use this next
verse to claim that the
Law was done away with:
ROM 6:14
For sin shall not have
dominion over you: for
ye are not under the
law, but under grace.
Yet, the
very next verses clear
it up:
ROM 6:15 What then?
Shall we sin, because we
are not under the law,
but under grace? God
forbid. 16 Know ye not,
that to whom ye yield
yourselves servants to
obey, his servants ye
are to whom ye obey;
whether of sin unto
death, or of obedience
unto righteousness?
We are no longer
under the condemnation
of the law if we are
Christ's. Through His
Holy Spirit, - the
"helper" He sent to us,
- we are able to
overcome future sins.
When the
time comes that man-made
laws are enacted which
contradict God's Ten
Commandments, or even
ONE of them, we will be
forced to make our
ultimate decision. God's
Law, or man's.
And just
as Cain's offering was
rejected by God because
it was not what He
required, so too will
those be rejected who
choose to honor a law
that is OPPOSED to what
God requires. Then, the
fury of Cain towards
Abel when his sacrifice
was rejected will again
be manifest in the fury
of those who reject
God's Laws towards those
who accept it.
Does this
sound too incredible to
be true? You don't have
to believe me - just
watch and wait.
The Ark
in Prophecy
THE ARK
OF THE COVENANT - "Home"
of God's Law
REV 11:19 And the temple
of God was opened in
heaven, and there was
seen in his temple
the ark of his testament:
and there were
lightnings, and voices,
and thunderings, and an
earthquake, and great
hail.
On that lonely Isle of
Patmos, John saw in
prophetic vision the
opening of the Most Holy
Place in Heaven. When,
in prophetic time, is
God's temple "opened"?
If you read the verse
just before it, Rev.
11:18, you'll see that
this is brought to
John's view just prior
to Christ's Second
Advent, where we are
told precisely what
happens when
Christ comes:
REV 11:18 And the
nations were angry, and
thy wrath is come, and
the time of the dead,
that they should be
judged, and that thou
shouldest give reward
unto thy servants the
prophets, and to the
saints, and them that
fear thy name, small and
great; and shouldest
destroy them which
destroy the earth.
And who "sees"
this opening of God's
temple? Well, I don't
think it is the heathens
who don't even know
that God's temple is in
Heaven. Who is aware of
the fact that God's
temple is in Heaven? The
true believers of God
who have studied His
Word..
But most
of all, why is His
temple "opened"
(symbolically speaking)
at the "time of the
dead, that they
shouldest be judged?"
That, Ron believed, is
of utmost importance.
The
Description of God's
People Just Prior to
Christ's Return
In
Revelation 14:14, Christ
is preparing to come for
the "harvest", which is
when He comes for the
righteous at His second
Advent. And just before
this, a group of people
are presented to view -
the righteous saints.
Let's read how they are
described:
REV 14:12 Here is the
patience of the saints:
here are they that
keep the commandments of
God, and the faith of
Jesus.
Oh, how
many times I've heard
people say "We're not
under the Law - the Ten
Commandments have been
done away with!" They
profess a love of God,
but when the Scriptures
are opened before them
and show the binding
claim of God's Law,
these people refuse to
even listen. They will
not compare their
doctrine with the "law
and the testimony".
Yet, God has closed His
Holy Book, the Bible,
with a perfect and
concise definition of
the people of God - they
are described as "those
who keep the
commandments of God".
It does not say,
"these are those who
didn't have to worry
about the Law, because
it was done away
with". No, we are
clearly told that these
are those who keep God's
commandments.
I realize
that this may be a new
concept to many people,
for we are hearing more
and more of "famous"
preachers who are
preaching that God's Law
has been done away with.
And if this idea is new
to you, please just hear
what we have to say.
As the
Ark in Heaven is brought
to view just before the
time Christ comes,
we understand that they
are not literally seeing
the Ark in Heaven, but
that their focus is on
something that is taking
place in the Heavenly
Most Holy Place - an
event. But what event?
We
believe God wants His
people to have a
complete understanding
of the events taking
place in Heaven,
concerning Christ's
mediation and office of
High Priest. And we know
that it is through
events on earth that He
brings His truths and
understanding to us.
At the
time of the end, His
people (the righteous)
know that time is almost
over. They know that the
vindication of His Law
is at hand. And Christ,
Himself, tells us that
the Law is still the
standard of
righteousness, even at
the time of the end:
REV 22:13 I am Alpha and
Omega, the beginning and
the end, the first and
the last. 14 Blessed
are they that do his
commandments, that they
may have right to the
tree of life, and may
enter in through the
gates into the city.
Adam was created perfect
- he could keep
the Law and eat of the
tree of life. But when
he sinned (fell), he
made a conscious
decision to do so, and
he lost man's right to
eat of that fruit spoken
of in the above verse,
from the tree of life,
and we inherited our
sinful nature from him.
When restored, we will
be able to keep His Law
again and again have
access to the fruit of
the tree of life. Christ
tells us in no uncertain
terms that those who
will eat of this tree
and enter into the city,
New Jerusalem, are
those who keep His
Commandments.
Satan has
twisted and perverted
the Scriptures so much
that many people today
really believe that they
do not have to keep
God's Law. If that's the
case, what happened to
that Law, spoken audibly
by the Lord at Sinai,
written twice in stone
by His own finger and
deposited in the Ark of
the Covenant of the
earthly sanctuary? Some
have used this next
verse as "evidence" that
we, believers, don't
have to keep God's Law:
GAL 5:18 But if ye be
led of the Spirit, ye
are not under the law.
No Longer
Under the PENALTY of the
Law
What happened to all
the other Scriptures
that clearly stated the
opposite? They're still
there! What Paul was
saying was that if you
are led of the Spirit,
you are not under
the penalty of the
law - your sins have
been forgiven, and the
Spirit guides you in
keeping God's Law.
Look at this next verse:
ROM 8:7
Because the carnal mind
is enmity against God:
for it is not subject to
the law of God, neither
indeed can be.
Does this mean the
carnal mind is also not
under any obligation to
keep God's Law? Another
definition of the Greek
word "hupotasso", (here
translated "subject"),
is "obedient". Now,
let's look at this verse
again - "The carnal
mind" is not obedient
"to the Law", neither
can it be. Why?
Because without Christ,
it is impossible to keep
the Law. Why would Paul
even discuss this
subject if it wasn't of
vital importance?
We as Christians must
have a correct
understanding of the
necessity of God's Law
and we must understand
the requirement of our
obedience to this Law.
If God could have
changed one precept of
His Law, then Christ
would not have needed to
die. But the
provision made for the
salvation of men through
the imputed
righteousness of Christ
does not do away with
the Law or lessen Its
claims.
The Law is the standard
of righteousness. I
think that maybe many
people refuse to
understand this great
truth because they know
that they do not keep
God's commandments and
they know that
they can't. AND THEY ARE
RIGHT! That's the whole
idea - we can't
keep His Law; not by our
own power. Christ's
death on the cross
occurred for one reason
- God is merciful and He
knew from the start that
we wouldn't be able to
keep His Law by our own
power. He knew that we
would all be condemned
to death if a provision
wasn't made for those
who love Him.
But once
we have come to Christ
and asked forgiveness
for our past sins, YES,
we CAN keep His Law.
The
"Covenant of Grace"
The Covenant of grace is
made whereby He extends
His mercy to fallen man;
His Only Begotten Son,
Christ, came to earth in
the flesh of fallen man,
lived without sin, then
bore the full penalty of
sin on the cross so that
His Father could apply
that payment to any and
all who come to Him
through the Blood of His
Son. And this is a free
gift to anyone
who asks.
The sins of those who
come to Him are not just
covered by the
righteousness of Christ
- His righteousness
actually replaces the
sin and it is forgotten
of them. In addition,
Christ sent the "Helper"
- the Holy Spirit, to
guide us, that we may
actually partake of the
Spirit of God. And it is
through the indwelling
of His Spirit that we
are able to keep His
Law. He knows that not
one of us can keep His
Law on our own - not
one of us. It is
simply impossible.
People may ask, "What's
the purpose in all this
plan of salvation if we
still can't keep the
Law"? Well, we can
keep the Law - but not
by our own power. Christ
showed us how.
Remember all the times
that Christ would go
away alone to pray?
Remember the agony of
Spirit He had as He
prayed? He was
just as we are
when He was on earth -
He felt every temptation
that all men feel.
People want to say He
didn't sin because "He
was God and therefore
perfect". But that's not
what the Bible says. It
says He came in the
flesh - and flesh is not
God. Flesh is human. He
is God but He
took on the form of man,
which included man's
inherited nature:
HEB 4:15 For we have not
an high priest which
cannot be touched with
the feeling of our
infirmities; but was
in all points tempted
like as we are, yet
without sin.
Why did
Christ Pray?
Why did Christ have to
pray? It wouldn't make a
lot of sense for Christ
to pray if He was
God, would it? Well, He
WAS and IS God, but He
came to earth AS A MAN.
He didn't live without
sin through His Own
Divine Strength. This is
the great mystery, but
the Bible is clear on
this matter. He, as a
man, prayed for the same
strength and wisdom that
you and I have access to
- the Holy Spirit.
That was
part of the plan -
Christ would come to
earth as a man. Even
though He was God, He
set aside His Divinity
to be like us. He was
subjected to the same
feelings and temptations
as you and I. But He
lived a life without sin
in order that He could
be the "perfect"
sacrifice.
Had He come to earth as
God, not as man, it
would have proved
nothing - people would
say He was able to live
without sin because He
was God. But He didn't
come as God, although He
was God - He came
in the form of man. And
because He lived without
sin under the same
circumstances that we
live, God allowed Him to
pass on to us that same
ability.
We have all sinned. We
will all sin again, most
likely. But if we
continuously ask
forgiveness for those
sins with repentance
and a true desire to
keep His Law, He will
forgive us and continue
to rehabilitate us.
And then,
when our time is "up",
when the Father looks at
us, He sees not our
sins, for they have been
actually removed from
our record and the
righteousness of His Son
covers us.
Our
Sinful Nature IS
Hereditary
Christ died for us to
provide the means that
we may be forgiven of
the times we break that
Law through human
weakness, and to give us
the only means to
keep the Law, or not
sin. We have all heard
of sin spoken of as
being "hereditary" - and
it is. The Bible is
clear on this point -
man is sinful by nature.
It's in our very genes.
Look at how modern
science is proving that
certain traits, such as
aggression, are actually
inherited. Christ and
the apostles many times
tried to explain to men
that their very fleshly
nature was sinful:
EPH 2:2 Wherein in time
past ye walked according
to the course of this
world, according to the
prince of the power of
the air, the spirit that
now worketh in the
children of
disobedience: 3 Among
whom also we all had our
conversation in times
past in the lusts of our
flesh, fulfilling the
desires of the flesh and
of the mind; and were by
nature the children of
wrath, even as others.
The
Righteousness of Christ
The Law
was in effect from the
beginning and remains in
effect. The penalty for
the transgression of
that Law is death.
Christ not only died to
vicariously pay our
penalty, but He did even
more. Christ provided
the only means by which
we could partake of His
righteousness and
overcome our inherited
nature. Through this
means, He "reconciled"
us with the Father.
JOH
14:6 Jesus saith unto
him, I am the way,
the truth, and the life:
no man cometh unto the
Father, but by me.
As a
human, Christ is our
example - He
demonstrated:
1
"The way":
the way it can be done;
the way man can partake
of His righteousness and
perfect character. This
is accomplished in us is
through faith in Him and
cooperation with the
Holy Spirit, Whom He
sent to us.
2
"The truth":
He came as a man, lived
perfect righteousness
through the same Spirit
that He imparts to those
of us who ask. He
demonstrated the truth
that this CAN be done by
man.
3
And He is "the life":
the life we will live
when we walk with Him by
faith and obedience. His
example was perfection.
If God's
Law had been done away
with, there would be no
such thing as sin:
1JO 3:4 Whosoever
committeth sin
transgresseth also the
law: for sin is the
transgression of the
law.
Did Christ die to take
away the law? No,
He died to take away
sin:
1JO 3:5
And ye know that he was
manifested to take away
our sins; and in him is
no sin.
He died
to pay the price that we
legally owe and remove
our past offenses from
our record. Who can
partake of this free
gift of forgiveness? It
is available to all:
ISA 55:7 Let the wicked
forsake his way, and the
unrighteous man his
thoughts: and let him
return unto the LORD,
and he will have mercy
upon him; and to our
God, for he will
abundantly pardon.
We Must
Cooperate in the
Working Out of Our Own
Salvation
PHIL 2:12
... work out your own
salvation with fear and
trembling.
We have
absolutely no power over
sin, except the power He
imparts to us when we
ask. And then, we must
cooperate with His Holy
Spirit. We are in charge
of our own salvation in
that we still have the
choice to allow Him to
work through us.
But, we
only have to let Him
lead the way. In doing
so, we find we keep His
Commandments. We find
our hearts full of love
for all of those for
whom He died. We find we
live the life He did. We
find we prove the truth
that it can be done.
Our past
sins are forgiven us and
they are removed from
our person. His
righteousness is imputed
to us. And when we sin
again, we ask
forgiveness again
through the merits of
Christ's Blood, and we
are forgiven again.
However,
we must be aware that
this in no way means we
can sin WILLFULLY and
continue to receive
forgiveness. The
Scriptures are very
clear on this matter.
HEB 10:26 For if we sin
willfully after that we
have received the
knowledge of the truth,
there remaineth no more
sacrifice for sins,
The plan
of salvation was
demonstrated in the
ceremonial law, or the
sacrificial system. Once
the people had accepted
God's covenant at Mount
Sinai and the
sacrificial system was
instituted by God, there
were many, many
offerings and
sacrifices, But study
carefully - for there
was NO provision given
by God for a sacrifice
for WILLFUL SIN.
"Working
out our own salvation"
is a daily process for
us all. It is a moment
to moment process - and
Satan is always there,
watching and waiting to
catch us off guard. It
is up to us - it is an
act of our own will
whether we assent to
allowing the Holy Spirit
to work in us, or not.
We see all around us the
results of breaking
God's Law. If God did
away with His Law and it
didn't exist in Heaven,
what a horrible
reward for the righteous
- to live eternally
in a violent,
destructive society! To
live without God's Law -
as the world lives today
- is something no
sane person could
possibly desire.
The Events at Calvary
Revealed in Scripture
ISA 45:8 Drop down, ye
heavens, from above, and
let the skies pour down
righteousness: let
the earth open, and
let them bring forth
salvation, and
let righteousness spring
up together;...
The earth at the foot of
the cross opened during
the earthquake at the
moment of Christ's death
(Mat. 27:50-51). Then:
JOH 19:34 ...one of the
soldiers with a spear
pierced his side, and
forthwith came there out
blood and water.
Just as Daniel had
prophesied, His Blood
then flowed down through
the freshly opened rock,
falling upon the
Mercy Seat - the
central object of the
Most Holy Place and
the literal earthly
throne of His Father:
DAN 9:24 Seventy weeks
are determined upon thy
people, and upon thy
holy city, to... make
reconciliation for
iniquity, and to
bring in everlasting
RIGHTEOUSNESS,...
and to
ANOINT THE MOST HOLY.
The prophecy of Isaiah
45:8, above, was then
fulfilled - "salvation"
and the way for all
mankind to obtain the "righteousness"
of Christ did "spring
up together" after
"the earth opened" and
His offering of His Own
Blood was accepted by
His Father.
1JOH 5:8
And there are three that
bear witness in the
earth, the Spirit, and
the water, and the
blood:...
In an instant, death was
defeated by the greatest
sacrifice in all
eternity. Dare we ever -
for even an instant -
lose sight of what has
been done for us? I pray
not. And lest we do, we
are reminded by the
prophet, Habakkuk, who
saw the future coming of
the Savior in the
heavens, that He
STILL bears the mark
of the spear in His side
from which flowed His
Precious Blood:
HAB 3:4 And his
brightness was as the
light; he had BRIGHT
BEAMS coming OUT OF HIS
SIDE: and THERE was the
HIDING OF HIS POWER.....
(Marginal reading).
Insight into Biblical
Understanding -
The MARK of the BEAST
Ancient
Manners of Speech
Have you
ever heard the phrase
"rule of thumb"? It's a
common phrase, but do
you know where it came
from? Get ready for a
shock if you don't know
the answer. It comes
from old U.S. laws which
provide that a husband
can beat his wife with a
stick no bigger around
than his thumb. It was
termed "the rule of
thumb" and long after
the law was abolished,
the phrase continued as
a "figure of speech".
But would it make sense
to someone who lived in
another country, spoke a
different language, and
wasn't familiar with our
colloquialisms?
The Bible was written by
men inspired by the Holy
Spirit, but they wrote
in the manner of
their everyday
"speaking", as opposed
to our manner of speech
today. And all people
develop "colloquialisms"
or phrases or "slang"
terms. For example, the
first well-known copying
machines were made by
Xerox, so we know what
is meant when someone
tells us to "make a
Xerox" of a document.
This is a "figure of
speech"; a word,
sentence or phrase which
is "figurative" in that
it's meaning differs
from the literal
translation. Some
"figures of speech" are
common to many languages
while some are unique to
one particular language.
Also, some change "with
the times", while others
are passed on.
Obviously, the pilgrims
didn't know what a "xerox
copy" was.
Some of
the "phrases" or
"figures of speech" are
a sort of "spoken
shorthand". Take the
term, "field hand" or
"ranch hand", used when
referring to those who
work in the fields or on
a ranch. This goes back
to Biblical antiquity,
where the "hand" is used
to represent the work or
deed performed by the
person. Hence, the
"field hand" works in
the field and the "ranch
hand" performs the work
at a ranch.
Sometimes, in reverse of
the above, the person
who performs the
"action" is used as the
word for the result of
that action. For
example:
LUK 16:29 Abraham saith
unto him, They have
Moses and the prophets;
let them hear them.
The people didn't
literally "have" Moses
and all the prophets
there with them- they
had the Divinely
inspired writings
of Moses and the
prophets.
Then,
there are "idioms" of
which the phrase "three
days and three nights"
is an example.
MAT 12:40 For as Jonas
was three days and three
nights in the whale's
belly; so shall the
Son of man be three days
and three nights in the
heart of the earth.
If this
phrase were to be taken
literally, Christ would
not have arisen on the
third day, but on the
fourth. Yet, we are told
distinctly:
MAT 16:21 From that time
forth began Jesus to
shew unto his disciples,
how that he must go unto
Jerusalem, and suffer
many things of the
elders and chief priests
and scribes, and be
killed, and be raised
again the third day.
The
Hebrew idiom "three days
and three nights" means
simply "a period of time
that covers parts of 3
days". It may begin the
last 5 hours of the 1st
day, then include all 24
of the 2nd, and end
after 4 hours into the
3rd day. But if we
interpret it according
to OUR manner of
speaking today, we think
it must mean 3 complete
day cycles of 24 hours
each. Yet, this is just
how the Hebrews reckoned
"days".
In the
time of Esther, we see
the same "idiom" and it
clearly does not include
all 72 hours of "3 days
and 3 nights":
EST 4:16 Go, gather
together all the Jews
that are present in
Shushan, and fast ye for
me, and neither eat nor
drink three days,
night or day: I also
and my maidens will fast
likewise; and so will I
go in unto the king,
which is not according
to the law: and if I
perish, I perish.
The literal
interpretation of this
above verse is that
Esther, her maidens and
all the Jews were to
fast for 3 complete days
and nights, or 72 hours,
and THEN she would "go
in unto the king". Yet,
we learn that she
appeared before the king
"on the third
day" in chapter 5 verse
1. ANY time during the
third day would be less
than 72 hours and hence
she and her maidens did
NOT fast for 3 days and
3 nights.
These
Biblical "figures of
speech" are seen and
understood from various
sources- many times they
can be understood in
"context" or from
numerous other Biblical
passages on the same
subject. Sometimes they
are discerned from other
non-Biblical documents
from the same time
period of the same
region. In other cases,
the language employed is
figurative for a
definite Divine purpose.
When writing about the
future Messiah, David
wrote:
PSA 78:2
I will open my mouth in
a parable: I will utter
dark sayings of old:.
In fact,
Christ spoke to the
multitude ONLY in
parables-stories which
were figurative and
explained Divine
principles:
MAT 13:34
All these things spake
Jesus unto the multitude
in parables; and without
a parable spake he not
unto them:
And
though the Bible is
literal in much that is
written, much is written
in "figurative"
language. Like Christ's
parables, great Truths
are expressed in terms
that are simply not
literal, but make it
absolutely clear what is
meant.
Just as
we earlier discussed the
origin of our term
"ranch hand" or "field
hand", we find hundreds
of Biblical instances
which are similar. For
example, the words
"head" and "forehead"
are used in this verse:
JER 3:3:... and thou
hadst a whore's forehead,
thou refusedst to be
ashamed.
This
admonition to Israel
meant that the people
were unfaithful to God
and had absolutely no
remorse for their
wrongful actions. The
word "forehead" here
implies the innermost
conscience of the
person, which is
centered in the brain
behind the forehead- who
they really are; their
morals; their character.
The "whore" had no
shame- she fully
assented to her actions,
unlike someone who may
be forced to perform the
same actions but does so
against her will.
The Mark
of the Beast
Understanding these
concepts gives insight
into the ever-popular
"mark of the beast"
which is received either
on the "hand" or on the
"forehead".
The
implication, as we now
understand it, is that
this "mark" is NOT a
literal visible "mark",
but instead an "action".
Received on the "hand"
means the action is
"performed" but does not
necessarily mean that
the person believes it
to be the right thing to
do. Received on the
"forehead" implies that
the action is performed
without any regret or
remorse; like the
"whore" who was without
shame, the person
performing the action is
in full agreement with
the act.
This is
further verified by the
fact that the "seal (or
mark) of God is received
ONLY in the forehead:
REV 9:4 And it was
commanded them that they
should not hurt the
grass of the earth,
neither any green thing,
neither any tree; but
only those men which
have not the seal of
God in their foreheads.
Satan's
"mark" is received by
doing the "action"
whether the person
believes it to be right
or not. They may even
KNOW it to be wrong and
do it because they are
compelled by threat of
bodily harm or loss of
property, etc. Hence
they are represented as
receiving it either in
the forehead or on the
hand.
But God's
mark, or "seal" is only
received by those who
perform the action out
of faithfulness to God-
they KNOW it is right
and why. They are
represented as receiving
it ONLY in the forehead.
The "seal
of God" and the "mark of
the beast" are actions
which, when performed,
separate the people who
are loyal to God from
those who are loyal to
Satan, or the "beast".
Those who are loyal to
Satan receive his mark
by either fully
accepting the principle
behind the action and
performing it ("in the
forehead"), or by simply
performing the action
EVEN though they may
know it to be wrong to
do so ("on the hand").
The
people of God, however,
receive His mark only
one way- by their
complete belief in the
action. No one receives
God's seal on their
"hand".
It's
something to think
about.......
END
|